I talked about corporate blogs with a journalist, and that's what happened

Forty minutes I spent to answer in detail the journalist's questions about corporate blogs. When the material came out, I read it and was very surprised.

The journalist asked the following question: “Do you agree with the quantitative assessment of the corporate blogosphere in RuNet in 60–70 projects? In particular, the figure of 57 blogs is cited by Jacob Lebedev. ” Now compare my answer to what was printed:

It was
I believe there are more of them. The same Jacob Lebedev, if I am not mistaken, already speaks about 150 blogs. In addition, there are blogs that are closed to the outside world.
')
It became
In his opinion, the assessment of Yakov Lebedev is now irrelevant, corporate diaries have increased.

Naturally, such a formulation did not please any of the persons mentioned. Please note: I did not speak at all about the assessment of Jacob and its relevance. Questions to readers:

1. What do you think about this? How would you react to this interpretation of your words?
2. How do you get out of situations when journalists in a similar way distort your words?
3. How do you prevent such situations? Mandatory approval of the full text before the publication does not offer.