⬆️ ⬇️

Money, money, rubbish ... Part 2.

So, the economic model of a cashless public.

I discussed this question until three o'clock yesterday ... so far nothing new has been found - just a few additional clarifications as to why such a model is still possible.



But what judgment has emerged.

If money is knocked out of society, one of the pillars will “fly out” in society - the pursuit of money as a means of survival. Survival is one of the most powerful engines of progress. In addition, it is a way of satisfaction.

In effect, this can be compared with the train, which at full speed "dug" into the rocky wall ...





Began to think. It looks like it really is. Now in society, the majority tries to improve their own lives, firmly “knowing” how to do it . The quality of this “knowledge” is one of the factors that strictly determine the speed of life improvement.

We do not take into account fanatics (who have no time to live, they have an Idea), and a lumpen-layer (such a low level of needs that the “gravitational collapse” of the psyche begins and, next, the remaining needs).

')

And a normal person waking up early in the morning discovers that he no longer needs to work to feed himself (and his family). Moreover, it is not necessary to hurry somewhere every day, the whole life belongs to him and his relatives. There is plenty of food and drink, apartments are enough for everyone, electricity in power outlets is free, a computer costs a hundred grams of sweat - while you drag it, and three hours of time - while you install software.



What to do? its main problem will be, according to the apt expression of the ABS, “what else would it be to devour, not yet eaten?” (“The Doomed City”).



This is a very powerful impact. True, I believe that the psyche of people is flexible enough to adapt to such a being and even begin to define it ...



But so far I have no idea what kind of relationship may arise.



- lit up right now. The main resource of the system of unlimited material possibilities is the lifetime. For it is a resource

(a) non-transferable

(b) non-renewable

(c) critical



And Bard's reasoning about “unique information” is bullshit. “What the two know — the pig knows” (c) the German saying.

- Please speak out.

Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/949/



All Articles