And what if in Belarus to take and ban all government sites?
Acting aloud and searching for like-minded people ...
In Belarus, on July 1, Decree No. 60 comes into force. If you look for dissatisfied among those who are tied to a business on the Belarusian Internet, then you can easily find 10 people out of 10. Won Coca-Cola in Belarus is already closing its site on July 1 due to the fact that the main brain of the Internet is planned to be placed in Belarus ( in fact, transferring the brain to us is the most terrible thing. Will the server withstand ???). In general, if you fail to agree , then you need to look for holes in the law to make people at the top understand that we don’t need such a law.
According to insider information, people from the Ministry of Communications, BelGIE and other subordinates and disinterested branches of the official initiative simply do not understand why the country should implement such a “bad” scheme.
')
I suggest this option. In accordance with Decree No. 60 to individuals, that is, users, the service on restricting access to Internet resources will be provided upon request, in accordance with the agreement concluded with the Internet service provider. Those. when accessing the provider, the consumer himself indicates the access to which information he needs to restrict. This can be either a list of addresses or some specific content. And then very interesting.
In this case, a natural question arises - can individuals demand to restrict access to the websites of the state bodies of Belarus? After all, in this way, those who are dissatisfied with the decree can actually paralyze the work of Internet representations of government agencies and major state enterprises, which fundamentally breaks the whole point of the decree and the existence of such sites, access to which should be free, by the way (I will demand free access from my old dial-up modem , funny).
By the way, ip in the country are overwhelmingly dynamically allocated, and MAC addresses change easily (I mean that everyone in the country has the same MAC address). It turns out that a sufficiently large array of ip-addresses will block access to state sites (this is if I understood the original idea of ​​the law correctly - restricting information during the 2011 campaign). But you can still connect to the Internet via Wi-Fi, in an Internet club, from a mobile phone, where you also have to restrict access to me automatically (so it’s with everyone else).
List of government sites is not difficult to make ...
In Belarus, on July 1, Decree No. 60 comes into force. If you look for dissatisfied among those who are tied to a business on the Belarusian Internet, then you can easily find 10 people out of 10. Won Coca-Cola in Belarus is already closing its site on July 1 due to the fact that the main brain of the Internet is planned to be placed in Belarus ( in fact, transferring the brain to us is the most terrible thing. Will the server withstand ???). In general, if you fail to agree , then you need to look for holes in the law to make people at the top understand that we don’t need such a law.
According to insider information, people from the Ministry of Communications, BelGIE and other subordinates and disinterested branches of the official initiative simply do not understand why the country should implement such a “bad” scheme.
')
I suggest this option. In accordance with Decree No. 60 to individuals, that is, users, the service on restricting access to Internet resources will be provided upon request, in accordance with the agreement concluded with the Internet service provider. Those. when accessing the provider, the consumer himself indicates the access to which information he needs to restrict. This can be either a list of addresses or some specific content. And then very interesting.
In this case, a natural question arises - can individuals demand to restrict access to the websites of the state bodies of Belarus? After all, in this way, those who are dissatisfied with the decree can actually paralyze the work of Internet representations of government agencies and major state enterprises, which fundamentally breaks the whole point of the decree and the existence of such sites, access to which should be free, by the way (I will demand free access from my old dial-up modem , funny).
By the way, ip in the country are overwhelmingly dynamically allocated, and MAC addresses change easily (I mean that everyone in the country has the same MAC address). It turns out that a sufficiently large array of ip-addresses will block access to state sites (this is if I understood the original idea of ​​the law correctly - restricting information during the 2011 campaign). But you can still connect to the Internet via Wi-Fi, in an Internet club, from a mobile phone, where you also have to restrict access to me automatically (so it’s with everyone else).
List of government sites is not difficult to make ...
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/94878/
All Articles