The first dream of my friend
Having learned that I have an “exit to Habr”, my workmate exulted, ran to his office and returned with a flash drive.
- Here, Vovchik! He exclaimed. - Post there! I beg you! I am not a mathematician, but I feel it is something!
- Here is the system? - I did not understand.
“This is ... This is,” he commented. - This is my dream.
- ?? !!!
- Well, everything is written there. This is, um, the new law of Gauss, you know? Do not look at me like that! Everything was as in reality! Everything is written there! Let the mathematicians take a look! Only I wrote in a hurry, at night, and typos are possible ...
Here is what was written at night (with all the "typos"):
I had a strange, but very logical dream. I am in some kind of audience and a clear voice tells me about the First Law of Gauss. From the school curriculum, I remember that Gauss discovered something in the field of electromagnetic induction, and the unit inductance -1 Gauss was named after him. But more than any of its laws, I have not heard. And of course he asked into the void, but did Gauss discover several laws? And I was told that the very first law that he deduced was related to theories of probability, and for that time it was not only very difficult, but also fraught with unpredictable consequences. Therefore, this law did not see the light. And the voice said that I should remember everything that I would hear, for this is the main thing, and you will bring out the details, they say.
Jumping to my feet, I grabbed the first notebook that came under my arm and wrote down everything I was told.
So, I bring what I heard:
The first law of Gauss reads as: Go = H (o)
')
The probability of realization of an event is equal to the realization of any n-probability of this event arising from the initial premise, (the expected event).
Gu = G1 or G2, or G3, or ... Gn, where Gog is the expected event, and G1, G2, ... Gn are the different probabilities of this expected event.
Each probability has an indefinite share of entropy with an unknown sign.
Entropy - the desire of the system (physical or empirical) to a state of complete rest (self-destruction). The more entropy, the faster the system will self-destruct.
Entropy is a non-constant value for various probable events, as well as for any physical systems.
Any probability of realization of an event has its own entropy.
The energy of entropy can accumulate in probabilities, distorting the initial premise of the probable event (the probable realization of the event).
The likelihood of an event depends on many variables, but there are some basic ones:
- intuition - І - depends on the specific person or the potential of the people (constant)
- entropy - E - depends on the purpose
- the number of probabilities of realizations - n
- T Gn - the search time of the probable implementation of one of the probabilities of the expected event
When asp tends to infinity, intuition remains constant, and entropy tends to infinity, as well as the search time Tgn
= n * + І - in this case the definition of probability does not make sense
T gn
The realization of the expected event is equal to the ratio of the product of the number of probabilities and the entropy Gn to the time of the realization of one probability, and the sum of the result obtained with intuition:
Go = N * E + І
T gn
The probability of choosing the right implementation of an event includes the personal qualities or qualities that are inherent in people:
- character - X +, X-
- individuality - And
- intuition - І
- need - N
- Purpose - With
- Causes (objective, subjective) - +, -
But that's not all:
All these qualities need to be disclosed even wider:
- X +: humanity, willpower, strength of spirit, goodwill, responsiveness, interpersonal skills, thoughtfulness, love, life experience, honesty, conscientiousness, dignity.
- X-: egoism + beauty, callousness + beauty, stupidity + beauty, indifference, passivity, temper, life experience, anger, envy, deceit, duplicity, compliment.
- And: a leader, a genius, a bright personality, exposure to someone else's influence, a hero, a fool, just a fool
- І: - there is an intuition: well developed, weak, extrasensory development
- no intuition
- Necessity: - strong
- weak
- Not necessary.
- C: good for oneself, bad for oneself, kind for all, bad for all
- P objective: the desire to prevent some kind of cataclysms or catastrophes, to foresee the development of progress, epochal inventions or discoveries.
- P subject: the desire to protect themselves from any personal problems, to anticipate the consequences of certain of their actions
Go = G1 or G2, or G3, or ... Gn
G1:
Need
Nature of the event
Positive qualities (parties)
Negative qualities (parties)
Objective reason
Subjective reason
G2:
Need
Nature of the event
Positive qualities (parties)
Negative qualities (parties)
Objective reason
Subjective reason
GN:
Need
Nature of the event
Positive qualities (parties)
Negative qualities (parties)
Objective reason
Subjective reason
Obviously, it is necessary to introduce an assessment scale for all absolutely, personal qualities, but nothing was said about this, this is my conjecture. But this is logical, because otherwise how to put all these qualities in the original, or in the formula following from the postulate?
In general, the postulate is interesting.
If you can charge a program on the computer based on this rubbish and see, can something work out? Maybe it will be possible on the basis of a computer program to predict our future?
Well, for example, take at least the problem of the next climate change - when irreversible processes can occur, threatening us with extinction. Based on this knowledge, it will be possible to take some kind of preventive measures, including the most terrible sanctions against violators of the ecological balance of the planet.
Or, let's say - space flights. How long will we hang like brown in an ice-hole near the Earth? When to master at least the planets of the solar system? Well, and so on.
A question for mathematicians: does all of the above make sense and is it possible to transfer it all to the program?
You can make your own adjustments, think out, suggest your schemes and introduce new parameters. But the Law should be left as it was formulated - I did not invent it, it means that it is not for us to change it!
This is the faith of Pavlovna, you see ...
- Here, Vovchik! He exclaimed. - Post there! I beg you! I am not a mathematician, but I feel it is something!
- Here is the system? - I did not understand.
“This is ... This is,” he commented. - This is my dream.
- ?? !!!
- Well, everything is written there. This is, um, the new law of Gauss, you know? Do not look at me like that! Everything was as in reality! Everything is written there! Let the mathematicians take a look! Only I wrote in a hurry, at night, and typos are possible ...
Here is what was written at night (with all the "typos"):
I had a strange, but very logical dream. I am in some kind of audience and a clear voice tells me about the First Law of Gauss. From the school curriculum, I remember that Gauss discovered something in the field of electromagnetic induction, and the unit inductance -1 Gauss was named after him. But more than any of its laws, I have not heard. And of course he asked into the void, but did Gauss discover several laws? And I was told that the very first law that he deduced was related to theories of probability, and for that time it was not only very difficult, but also fraught with unpredictable consequences. Therefore, this law did not see the light. And the voice said that I should remember everything that I would hear, for this is the main thing, and you will bring out the details, they say.
Jumping to my feet, I grabbed the first notebook that came under my arm and wrote down everything I was told.
So, I bring what I heard:
The first law of Gauss reads as: Go = H (o)
')
The probability of realization of an event is equal to the realization of any n-probability of this event arising from the initial premise, (the expected event).
Gu = G1 or G2, or G3, or ... Gn, where Gog is the expected event, and G1, G2, ... Gn are the different probabilities of this expected event.
Each probability has an indefinite share of entropy with an unknown sign.
Entropy - the desire of the system (physical or empirical) to a state of complete rest (self-destruction). The more entropy, the faster the system will self-destruct.
Entropy is a non-constant value for various probable events, as well as for any physical systems.
Any probability of realization of an event has its own entropy.
The energy of entropy can accumulate in probabilities, distorting the initial premise of the probable event (the probable realization of the event).
The likelihood of an event depends on many variables, but there are some basic ones:
- intuition - І - depends on the specific person or the potential of the people (constant)
- entropy - E - depends on the purpose
- the number of probabilities of realizations - n
- T Gn - the search time of the probable implementation of one of the probabilities of the expected event
When asp tends to infinity, intuition remains constant, and entropy tends to infinity, as well as the search time Tgn
= n * + І - in this case the definition of probability does not make sense
T gn
The realization of the expected event is equal to the ratio of the product of the number of probabilities and the entropy Gn to the time of the realization of one probability, and the sum of the result obtained with intuition:
Go = N * E + І
T gn
The probability of choosing the right implementation of an event includes the personal qualities or qualities that are inherent in people:
- character - X +, X-
- individuality - And
- intuition - І
- need - N
- Purpose - With
- Causes (objective, subjective) - +, -
But that's not all:
All these qualities need to be disclosed even wider:
- X +: humanity, willpower, strength of spirit, goodwill, responsiveness, interpersonal skills, thoughtfulness, love, life experience, honesty, conscientiousness, dignity.
- X-: egoism + beauty, callousness + beauty, stupidity + beauty, indifference, passivity, temper, life experience, anger, envy, deceit, duplicity, compliment.
- And: a leader, a genius, a bright personality, exposure to someone else's influence, a hero, a fool, just a fool
- І: - there is an intuition: well developed, weak, extrasensory development
- no intuition
- Necessity: - strong
- weak
- Not necessary.
- C: good for oneself, bad for oneself, kind for all, bad for all
- P objective: the desire to prevent some kind of cataclysms or catastrophes, to foresee the development of progress, epochal inventions or discoveries.
- P subject: the desire to protect themselves from any personal problems, to anticipate the consequences of certain of their actions
Go = G1 or G2, or G3, or ... Gn
G1:
Need
Nature of the event
Positive qualities (parties)
Negative qualities (parties)
Objective reason
Subjective reason
G2:
Need
Nature of the event
Positive qualities (parties)
Negative qualities (parties)
Objective reason
Subjective reason
GN:
Need
Nature of the event
Positive qualities (parties)
Negative qualities (parties)
Objective reason
Subjective reason
Obviously, it is necessary to introduce an assessment scale for all absolutely, personal qualities, but nothing was said about this, this is my conjecture. But this is logical, because otherwise how to put all these qualities in the original, or in the formula following from the postulate?
In general, the postulate is interesting.
If you can charge a program on the computer based on this rubbish and see, can something work out? Maybe it will be possible on the basis of a computer program to predict our future?
Well, for example, take at least the problem of the next climate change - when irreversible processes can occur, threatening us with extinction. Based on this knowledge, it will be possible to take some kind of preventive measures, including the most terrible sanctions against violators of the ecological balance of the planet.
Or, let's say - space flights. How long will we hang like brown in an ice-hole near the Earth? When to master at least the planets of the solar system? Well, and so on.
A question for mathematicians: does all of the above make sense and is it possible to transfer it all to the program?
You can make your own adjustments, think out, suggest your schemes and introduce new parameters. But the Law should be left as it was formulated - I did not invent it, it means that it is not for us to change it!
This is the faith of Pavlovna, you see ...
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/90651/
All Articles