GLONASS is not needed?
When talking about GLONASS, the general attitude is usually expressed quite well by this picture:
In fact, this is not quite the case. Recently, I was puzzled by the choice of a professional automotive data logger, and came across such a table . Pay attention to the second line - the best in positioning device (2 cm when using a base station) - supports the reception of both the GPS signal and GLONASS.
In general, it remains only to rejoice at the enterprising British engineers who legitimately receive income from our technology. And what about us? We do not release receivers for the GLONASS signal ( 1K-181 is not counted, it differs dozens of times from its analogs in size and consumption), we don’t take royalty from produced receivers. Oh yeah, I forgot - GLONASS goes to IPO , we will earn money on sawing . For the power offensively shorter.
In fact, this is not quite the case. Recently, I was puzzled by the choice of a professional automotive data logger, and came across such a table . Pay attention to the second line - the best in positioning device (2 cm when using a base station) - supports the reception of both the GPS signal and GLONASS.
In general, it remains only to rejoice at the enterprising British engineers who legitimately receive income from our technology. And what about us? We do not release receivers for the GLONASS signal ( 1K-181 is not counted, it differs dozens of times from its analogs in size and consumption), we don’t take royalty from produced receivers. Oh yeah, I forgot - GLONASS goes to IPO , we will earn money on sawing . For the power offensively shorter.
')
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/89009/
All Articles