Most recently, I was “fortunate enough” to be present as a third party in one trial. The dispute arose between the customer site and its developers. I will not describe the details, and there is no point in this - the story is banal, this happens all the time (except that the case does not always reach the court).
I must admit that participation in such events is a very unpleasant task, just don’t think about it, I’m not a masochist, and not a pervert, my interest was purely research. I wanted to see with my own eyes how it all happens to make our company stronger and less vulnerable in a legal sense.
What do you say? I came out of the courthouse, to say the least, stunned. Why? Because such clear and obvious categories for me as: “website”, “quality design”, “online store”, “valid layout”, “design templates”, “contextual advertising”, “e-mail”, “programming”, “Internet sales” - the list can be continued for a very long time; they have absolutely no weight for the judge.
')
If, God forbid, you get to court, be prepared for the fact that for the judge the words "Internet" (and everything connected with it) and "evidence base" are antonyms. Only calculations are taken into account: payment documents, contracts, payments, acts, ext. agreements, etc. The one who correctly compiled them, signed them and sent them on time - he will win! And the truth .., it is as usual, somewhere near: (.