Natalia Petkevich, the first deputy head of the presidential administration, mentioned two reasons that, in her opinion, are sufficient grounds for regulating the Internet - copyright and morality.
Today, those who are interested in copyright issues are really interested in regulating the Internet. First of all, these are people of creative professions. And if society agrees that copyright must be protected, then the Internet, like all other sources of information, is also subject to regulation. Petkevich publishes such a retelling of statements by the BelTA agency.
“Parents, the church, absolutely all of society speaks of the need to protect morality. So, you need to put barriers on the Internet so that our children do not look at what we can prohibit in other sources of information. Such barriers are needed to ensure the protection of human rights, the rights of the performer, the rights of the disseminator of information. ” ')
“This practice exists all over the world, and our country is not an exception,” said Petkevich.
PS That's interesting, they generally understand what they are talking about? Or thirst for prohibition undividedly dominates in the inter-node nodes?