At the beginning of 2009, a “Forbidden Advertising for the Year of Youth” movie made in the studio of Robert Schlegel rolled over the Internet on the Internet. After a week and a half, the answer was “The not yet banned video for officials” or simply “The roller of officials” ( discussion on Habré )
The article of the Private Correspondent is given a detailed authoritative! analysis, which states that both videos were created by the same author:
“Made by Schlegel and his studio inspires respect.There are still people in Russia who can make powerful advertising and good public relations.Here are just the slogans proposed by them - noisy populism, and nothing more.It is a pity for the users who argued so vigorously about the merits and demerits of the original and reciprocal video of the same author. ”
I will, to the best of my abilities, try to point out the author of this article to inaccuracies. First of all, I have nothing to do with Schlegel, I have a cold attitude to his personality. The “roller of officials” appeared as a reaction to the inadequate “prohibited advertising ...” However, both the first and second video, in my opinion, are absolutely useless from the point of view of propaganda of something. We have learned to pose a problem, but have not yet proposed a solution. We say: “The youth drinks and the officials steal!” But how to stop the teenagers from drinking and stealing the official? The system is changing the system approach, and not one-time crackers.
“Satisfied users thanked an anonymous video maker.As if in confirmation of the fact that the ideologues-enthusiasts have not yet been translated into the country. ”
Who and why ordered this video? Someone for some reason ordered. Contrary to his general pshikov (in terms of influence on the minds), he has brought benefits to all involved in its creation. For us, it was expressed, first of all, in the study of new technologies. Technical and moral.
At the stage of ideological preparation, a system of “propagation engines” was invented. It covered the text, video sequence and even the algorithm for launching a movie. The concept seemed to us correct, and we expected at least 100 thousand views. We got them. On the first day.
Even the author of the article, Julia Eidel, notes the serious work done:
“Knowing the process of video editing not by hearsay, I can say that the response video was made very professionally, on the same level and in the same style as the first one.Such a trailer, especially without source materials (numerous videos and photos), cannot be done in a few days.This is a huge hard work. ”
Months of carrying out and formulating ideas, weeks spent on technical implementation, an extensive staff of people working on the video. Schlegel is great, but it has nothing to do with our video.
Julia Eidel will be interested to know that the period of ideological preparation of our video was 3 days, and the visualization was completed in 2 days, well, to be honest, in two days. (Many thanks to Artemy Lebedev for making clarifications to the spelling of the video) As a result, we were able to start the video as soon as possible after the appearance of Schlegelsky.
What is probably shocking to "professional filmmaker from Poland":
“Both videos are made too seriously.Please note there are a lot of chronicles, in two videos it is different, and in fact it is quite difficult to get it.The chronicle of the old video is usually stored in a special institution.“Ostankino,” I think, also has its own chronicle library, but only TV people have access to it. ”
Dear kinomontazhter will be surprised by the capabilities of the modern Internet.
On the other hand, how can I check that the video was really made by me? First, only on our site you can see it in excellent quality. Secondly, I think everyone will be interested to look at the video sequence, and specifically at 1:22. There, among the flashing officials, a frame with an arrow is clearly visible, as a guarantee of future verification :)
Total.Almost 1 million views, 5 thousand comments all over the Internet, dozens of articles, the attention of the State (by the way, all the officials I know just thrilled when watching a video, nothing makes them feel as good as Oherel? ”).
PS 2009, despite adversity, was bright. It is a pity that, despite all the efforts of the government, the Year of Youth has passed almost without a trace.