iPhone 3G. Court against MTS. Continuation
In continuation of the previous post on the topic of litigation with MTS.
At the moment, the situation is as follows.
In OZPP was written the text of the appeal. Basically, the appeal is based on the fact that the judge refused me (did not accept my questions for examination, refused me to choose the organization conducting the examination, to call the expert to court and to additional examination) without the necessary motivation of the decision. And this is a procedural violation.
In addition, it turned out that the expert who conducted the technical expertise had a left certificate issued by the same organization where he works (CIES) - and this organization does not have the authority to issue certificates to its employees, and generally certify experts.
')
In addition, OZPP lawyers found that during the examination a number of violations were committed.
December 14, the appeal was filed in court. Now we are waiting for the agenda for the meeting (99%, that this will not be before January 2010). Go to court with a lawyer from OZPP.
Unfortunately, the consultants warned me that the chances of a successful outcome of the case are extremely small, because our judges do not like to cancel their own decisions. It was necessary to win the case immediately ...
At the moment, the situation is as follows.
In OZPP was written the text of the appeal. Basically, the appeal is based on the fact that the judge refused me (did not accept my questions for examination, refused me to choose the organization conducting the examination, to call the expert to court and to additional examination) without the necessary motivation of the decision. And this is a procedural violation.
In addition, it turned out that the expert who conducted the technical expertise had a left certificate issued by the same organization where he works (CIES) - and this organization does not have the authority to issue certificates to its employees, and generally certify experts.
')
In addition, OZPP lawyers found that during the examination a number of violations were committed.
December 14, the appeal was filed in court. Now we are waiting for the agenda for the meeting (99%, that this will not be before January 2010). Go to court with a lawyer from OZPP.
Unfortunately, the consultants warned me that the chances of a successful outcome of the case are extremely small, because our judges do not like to cancel their own decisions. It was necessary to win the case immediately ...
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/79075/
All Articles