By the way about Hyper-V or Microsoft - again the birthplace of elephants

I forgot to tell - about three months ago, the world was overwhelmed by a sensation from Microsoft - Hyper-V finally learned to move machines from server to server without downs (if of course the presence of shared storage).



My father-in-law came from a presentation where everything he says was beautifully and theatrically arranged, expensively done, and skillful prestigeurs skillfully hung noodles on their ears. As a result, the actual person for a long time was convinced that the iphone 3g is the first phone with 3g Hyper-V, the first virtualizer capable of moving containers without downs.



But the idea suggests a bad thing. Breshut and let yourself breshut, there is nothing to envy someone else's gesheft. And it brings something that too somehow everything works out fine - Citrix buys XenServer, XenServer gets VHDs, Hyper-V gets live migration, not much later than Xen implementation, but the technology is quite complex and requires many years to implement, in short there are no such coincidences. It turns out, guys from Redmond, it seems like the same code from Xen? I will not argue, but the idea is far from fantastic ...

')

And where is the warts eater looking? And nowhere. This whole GPL and other open source is a fairy tale for the people, this is an opportunity to get away from taxes and antimonopolists nicely, and sometimes even get free fanatic slaves into the team. The FSF is the most successful piece of fiscal bodies invented by corporations over the past 50 years. I do not want to say that the software should not be open. Software should not be free. But in practice, it’s still beer. People do not need freedom. He needs booze and girls.