Just came up with the idea, until I forgot, I will try to formulate.
In the vastness of the web, the same issues are discussed in a thousand different places. Sometimes, for example, users express their opinion about the political situation on the forum of hamsters breeders. Or Holivar about Linux and Mac in the photo community. On topical topics you can find hundreds of absolutely identical statements.
I Pulse - this, of course, is good, but does not give a qualitative assessment.
So, the essence of the project:Create a global user-generated moderately moderated code aggregator.
To do this, write the client extension under the FF / socket on the IE and, in fact, the site itself. Next - the project.
What exactly:Group questions.
Project users can add any questions by tagging them. Questions are pre-moderated, in case the tags are crooked. There can be any complexity, ranging from “Are you for Putin, or not?” With a Boolean answer, and ending with “How do you feel about what Putin said dd / mm / yy in the context of relations with xxx?” anything but voting by active users, top N answers are available. Any questions can be sorted by tags in conjunction with popularity / date - i.e. see which are the most popular / recent questions about Putin or Ubuntu.
Group sources.
Virtually any place where you can leave the kament, there is a link to a specific kament. Project users can add new sources in a formatted form, which is checked by moderators. Anything like
site.net/xxx/thread/?commentid=xxx . When activating browser pribluda, it automatically highlights the places where you can poke to send your assessment. If questions have already been sent out of this sub-source (
site.com/xxx/thread ), it substitutes them in the side panel.
If the same question was sent several times, then repeating to the total number of votes does not add, but increases the rating of the item. Within each question, make it possible to sort by popularity / date of the cells.
On the pribluda panel, make a choice of language, a compact tag search, a question ID input field and advanced functions.
')
Since kamenty is left in 80% of cases so that at least someone read the opinion of the fasting person, at least they will send their kamenty. In addition, there is a huge number of forum fighters who can evaluate dozens of kamentov from one source, for such a tie rating appraisers.
This is also a step towards creating AI :)
The opinion of the habra people about this is interesting.