CRU letters leakage undermines British climatologists reputation

So, it seemed to me I hid this post. But minuschiki keep coming. Hello! Go where you want.

Here in the world broke a small scandalous heightened smelly c leak archive of correspondence from the Climate Research Unit of the University of East Anglia. Mainstream media is trying to politely ignore the story and even, they say, this topic has been deleted on slashdot. Meanwhile, critics of global warming rejoice in the blogosphere - they haven't had such a holiday for a long time!
So, if you believe the succulent pressing of quotes (also here ) from the correspondence of prominent climatologists - warm weather men , they achieved victories in scientific disputes by the following methods:

• free handling of data
• concealment and destruction of scientific data
• the destruction of the archives of correspondence in order to avoid publicity
• blowing round numbers to the press, creating the appearance of scientific consensus
• prevent publication of objectionable articles by political methods
• the removal of unwanted editors, also through intrigues

I can not say anything about global warming in general, since I am not a climatologist. But the texture allows you to doubt the scientific integrity of this particular group of British scientists. As I understand it, the schedule that Al Gore so artistically demonstrated in his film is based on the data of this particular group.