Human rights activists took up the game "about the war"

A pair of Swiss human rights organizations - Pro Juventute and Trial - put forward a number of claims to modern computer games on military subjects. According to them, toys like Call of Duty 4, Far Cry 2, Soldier of Fortune, and others violate the Geneva Convention and form a misconception about wars among players. Emerging stereotypes lead to inadequate actions of the player, in case he gets into a real “hot spot”.



One of the most prominent examples is the airport level in the latest Call of Duty. Human rights activists believe that all those who drenched innocent people in that level of this toy behaved illegally and inadequately. “Only in very few games is the user responsible for the destruction of civilians. Moreover, we can often observe a situation when religious and cultural objects like churches, cemeteries and museums are attacked. ”



In general, it's time for igrodels to make a game about human rights defenders, and human rights defenders can play Postal 2, I’m doing this so suddenly my heart attack is enough.

')

The list of "bad" games about the war:



24, The Game

Army of two

Battlefield Bad Company

Brothers in Arms - Hell's Highway

Call of duty 4

Call of duty 5

Close Combat: First to Fight

Conflict Desert Storm

Far cry 2

World in conflict

Frontlines: Fuel of War

Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter

Hour of Victory

Medal of Honor Airborne

Metal gear solid

Soldier of fortune

Tom Clancy Rainbow 6 Vegas

Tom Clancy Splinter Cell Double Agent

True Crime Streets of LA



via news.bbc.co.uk