Spam from the Mango-office - they are completely fooled there, or what?

Viagra and OEM software are not surprising. It is surprising when a seemingly serious company includes spam in the media plan along with other media.
Under the cut screenshot and headers.




')

 Return-Path: <kjgqj@krka.si>
 Received: from gate8.r3.iad.emailsrvr.com (gate8.r3.iad.emailsrvr.com [192.168.1.49])
	 by mail16b.r4.iad.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 56726284089;
	 Thu, Apr 26 2007 17:46:07 -0400 (EDT)
 X-Virus-Scanned: OK
 X-Spam-Flag: YES
 X-Spam-Score: 7.953
 X-Spam-Level: *******
 X-Spam-Status: Yes, score = 7.953 tagged_above = -100 required = 6
	 tests = [DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX = 1.572, DNA = 0.001, DNA_61 = 5.998,
	 HTML_FONT_BIG = 0.256, HTML_TAG_EXIST_TBODY = 0.126]
 Received: from PY118.neoline.com.br (PY118.neoline.com.br [200.223.250.118])
	 by gate8.r3.iad.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with SMTP id 2AF8B44E327
	 for <info@metalinkltd.com>;  Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:45:49 -0400 (EDT)
 From: "=? Koi8-r? B? 99rSz9PMwdEg09fR2tggxMzRIM3PzM / Ez8ogy8 / N0MHOyck =? =" <Kjgqj@krka.si>
 To: <kjgqj@krka.si>
 Subject: [SPAM] =? Koi8-r? B? 99rSz9PMwdEg09fR2tggxMzRIM3PzM / Ez8ogy8 / N0MHOyck =? =
 Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 21:07:08 +0400