One step from love to hate, or the whole truth about the “Runet Prize”
As far as I know, about 25 percent of people with Internet access know me.
Of them (we take this number as 100 percent), 10 percent actively hate me, 10 - have not decided on their attitude towards me, and 80 percent rate me positively.
')
It is curious: those who actively do not love, do not tolerate me, as they say, to the spirit, show not just rejection, but aggressive rejection.
However, this is understandable. Hate is always aggressive.
I felt this after our project “ SOLO on the keyboard ” became a participant in voting for the “ Runet Prize ”.
Of course, to compete with online games or frankly pirated sites is difficult, but we took a chance. But what if for the first time since the Runet Prize promotion, the winners are not a commercial game, an erotic website, not a pirated resource, but an educational project?
It seems to me that the “Runet Prize” should be built on a different principle. For games - one vote, for educational programs - another, for entertainment - the third, for commercial portals - the fourth, for personal pages - the fifth ...
It's like in sports: it is impossible for heavyweights to compete with lightweights, runners without taking into account the distance ...
In general, of course, the idea is excellent, and I think the competition will turn into a serious festival and into the possibility of selecting the most interesting thing that appears in Runet.
What comment can be, if such a serious and important resource as Wikipedia is “hammered” by insignificant games?
It seems to me that talking about how a competition for the best Internet project should be held is very promising and curious. Maybe start it?
What can be done to make such contests an event?
True and true in holding such contests.
Contest rules.
Here are topics that I think are most relevant to the discussion.
PS Well, as for the “SOLO on the keyboard”, what to talk about it, when everything is already known ... And thanks to everyone who understands me.
Of them (we take this number as 100 percent), 10 percent actively hate me, 10 - have not decided on their attitude towards me, and 80 percent rate me positively.
')
It is curious: those who actively do not love, do not tolerate me, as they say, to the spirit, show not just rejection, but aggressive rejection.
However, this is understandable. Hate is always aggressive.
I felt this after our project “ SOLO on the keyboard ” became a participant in voting for the “ Runet Prize ”.
Of course, to compete with online games or frankly pirated sites is difficult, but we took a chance. But what if for the first time since the Runet Prize promotion, the winners are not a commercial game, an erotic website, not a pirated resource, but an educational project?
It seems to me that the “Runet Prize” should be built on a different principle. For games - one vote, for educational programs - another, for entertainment - the third, for commercial portals - the fourth, for personal pages - the fifth ...
It's like in sports: it is impossible for heavyweights to compete with lightweights, runners without taking into account the distance ...
In general, of course, the idea is excellent, and I think the competition will turn into a serious festival and into the possibility of selecting the most interesting thing that appears in Runet.
What comment can be, if such a serious and important resource as Wikipedia is “hammered” by insignificant games?
It seems to me that talking about how a competition for the best Internet project should be held is very promising and curious. Maybe start it?
What can be done to make such contests an event?
True and true in holding such contests.
Contest rules.
Here are topics that I think are most relevant to the discussion.
PS Well, as for the “SOLO on the keyboard”, what to talk about it, when everything is already known ... And thanks to everyone who understands me.
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/74983/
All Articles