Implications of being an expert in court

In continuation of the topic habrahabr.ru/blogs/Legal_advice/66994

During the trial, the lawyer challenged my statements and suggested that I write him a letter allegedly from himself. I agreed, but the judge said that such a correspondence would not prove anything to anyone, and spoke of a qualified examination.

Later, as I wrote, the lawyer stopped challenging my examination.
After consulting with the defendant, we decided not to send anything to anyone, because This may be a provocation (I do not believe in it, but still).

Literally an hour ago my phone is ringing. The person specifies who I am and presented. This is the plaintiff's attorney.
He asks why I did not send him a fake letter. I explain that I do not see the point, because he stopped arguing. Well said, so you can not do this? "I can, but I will not." He began to insist, called my examination "drawings" and, as a result of the conversation, said:
- Chatterbox You, Stepan, I will break your glasses when you meet.
')
Actually everything.
Funny, right?

He wrote a statement to the bar and the police department. Papers accepted, promised to sort out.
We look forward to continuing with interest.