Code editor

For a long time I’m choosing a Code Editor myself ...

• aptana (php, rails, etc.) & eclipse
• netbeans (ruby)
• e-texteditor (html, css, js, ruby, php, etc.)
• gedit (html, css, js, ruby, php, etc.)
• geany (ruby)

Did not like what

aptana (windows, linux & etc (eclipse)) - overloaded with everything, does not find installed “gems” without “dancing with a tambourine”, very slow, no “from box” switching between tabs by [ctrl + tab], braking is very autocomplete, extremely inadequate search by docks - it searches first of all for the native (which was “included”) and only then, perhaps, will it display the results by external Docks.

eclipse (windows, linux & etc) - “Environment” ... since aptana is an add-in that is the same as to it, can be attributed to the “father”, further: not convenient update, not convenient search for modules.

netbeans (windows, linux) - tasks in a separate window, the absence of “block selection” / selection of several arbitrary lines of code, the lack of an adequate sqlite navigator “out of the box”, again very slow, but not as much as eclipse, not the native layout and anti-aliasing
')
The common thing for the above is the corporate style of development - “we make a product, offer it, can we ever do it ...” (the proposal for block allocation for netbeans to “gather dust”, if memory serves - since 2005 ...), a lot of unnecessary and impossible without "dancing with a tambourine" to get rid of it

e-texteditor (windows & linux (not very stable)) - there is no adequate build under linux, very slow for the editor, not the IDE, sometimes the inadequate influence of some “bundles” on others, for example, when installing “bundles” ruby ​​refused to do validation correctly code (js, html, css) while maintaining giving out a ruby-error, sometimes not stable work - frequent departures (from version to version the situation becomes better but in general the situation does not change, which is strange for the product "for money"), there is a button for create a “folder” and file to use, for adequate perception of the “application” you need to it’s better to forget the right-click menu; it doesn’t close tags by default, doesn’t show a bunch of opening-closing (tags, constructs, classes & etc) when hovering over one of the links, making it difficult to debug the application, does not visually separate different languages in one file: html is html, css is css & etc, does not update its “knowledge” of new standards.

gedit (linux (default gnome editor)) is stable, but the infusion of “new shelter” causes “harassment” a feeling that initially it was not predisposed for plug-ins, they for the most part do not behave natively in it, the lack of multi-allocation / block allocation The module for this is extremely inconvenient in practice, navigation through the tree is extremely inconvenient since the “dips” inside the directory with a double “click” do not give pleasure, the lack of adequate work with the “projects”, outdated or not convenient snippets.

geany (linux, windows) - there are no adequate projects - it’s not at all clear why this “concept” is introduced in this application, there are general settings, but the “huge” part of the settings is for some reason in files, that is, without an interface: "-Nate !. .. ".
Common to all: the lack of a quick setting interface for “display themes”, or for some reason, they are configured exclusively for each language — without common rules, or it is not possible to display “blocks of different languages” in one file in accordance with the settings; help (by language, if there is one, of course) - for the most part it does not correspond to the last names and for some reason does not “strive” to be updated.

What is this all about?

It was thought that there is probably no perfect editor, for some one is good, but for the other it is not acceptable in principle, but it is worthwhile to assemble a company of people united by “common vision” and assemble your code editor, no, not ide, but just an editor.

What do you want?

• Easy and fast
• Platform independent
• Online application
• Docks and autocompiles based on the latest estates
• Multi-selection / editing
• Free and simple customization of the appearance of the application and the code with "inheritance"
• Editing in preview, “in the wake of firebug”
• Recognition of file language and file blocks based on context
• Upload to server / project / files
• Active links to resources

Appeal

• Add something that does not suit you in your Code Editor.
• Suggest what you would like to see in the Code Editor and how you would like it to be.
• Do you want to participate - so what's stopping you? :)