Misunderstanding of markup. XHTML 2 and HTML5 Comics

With the release of HTML 5 and the announcement of the W3C about stopping the development of XHTML 2 at the end of 2009, an active debate about the future "correct markup" began. XHTML 1.0, XHTML 2, HTML 4, HTML 5 and XHTML 5 - all this is hard to keep track of.

Now that XHTML 2 has stopped looming on the horizon, which syntax to choose? Stay on XHTML 1.0, or move forward to HTML 5? Or maybe go back to the good old HTML 4? This comic clarifies a bit.



* not rum, and not a woman - in the original “as ham is to hamster”, so he keeps a piece of meat next to the hamster.
* Say thanks to the principle of "the trodden path" - in the original, the principle is called " pave the cowpath ".
')

Links and quotes mentioned in the comic

• Link # 1: An Unofficial Q & A about the Discontinuation of the XHTML2 WG
• Link 2: In defense of web developers
• Quote drew
• Bruce's quote

upd .: transferred to web development.