The purpose of the text: to show possible ways of constructive communication of representatives of competing technologies.
Tactics of propaganda of our platform
We are peaceful and respect other technologies;
We distinguish between the developers of a competing platform and its users;
We have never competed with a rival platform (paradox? Yes);
We help rival platform users in the battle for standards and open source software along with our competitors;
We help users of software that is incompatible with ours;
We gave a lot of our technologies to Open Source.
We have provided our technology for its implementation on all operating systems;
The love of quality in everything we share with our competitors;
Our and your technologies are great, and we are confident in the future;
We have the general spirit of the pioneers of Web2.0;
Our technologies are already used by many developers who influence the development of our platform;
Creativity of designers and products of open-source communities (including Linux users) are widely used in our solutions. Many of our developers have come from a rival community;
Books of supporters of a competing platform are popular in our company and among our users. We study learn their languages. Note: you need to review new blogs of reputable competitors and research on their technology , even if they do not have important content;
We publicly admire the achievements of the rival platform and honestly recognize its advantages;
We help all users and developers, regardless of whether they agree with our concept;
We use programming patterns, and do not hide the fact that the main contribution to their development is made by the Open-Source community;
Our managers, department heads and many private developers tried to establish cultural and technical exchanges with competing technology;
About our essence and the essence of the free world, the main ideals that we share with users of competing technology, give an idea of the key works on programming: Wirth, GoF. Although some of these books belong to the direction of "social protest", they show faith in social progress in action.
Note: the text of both parts is edited. Ambiguous formulations and fragments that are not related to the ethics of professional communication have been eliminated.