The state and prospects of electronic business in Russia and Ukraine.
He published his analytical review in the “columns” section. The state and prospects of electronic business in Russia and Ukraine.
He has a rather interesting and instructive story.
I wrote it a month and a half ago, when I actively corresponded with some development teams, in an attempt to give a hint of my ideas, and published on my website sozday.info/wiki/124/85
(The project is still in the sandbox, I do not temporarily deal with it)
What was my surprise when after a while I saw my article on e-commerce.com.ua/3759
with reference to the mythical Webplanet !!!
Well, then it was reprinted from there www.i-market.ru/news.php?id=7070 with reference to e-commerce, etc.
Naturally, all my complaints of injustice were ignored.
In this regard, taking this opportunity, it is interesting to study how search engines learned to identify the source and duplication of content.
Since in my article I used the terms I had invented to denote non-existent services, the search naturally gave a very limited number of results.
The winner in this category was, oddly enough, Yahoo!
He not only found the source, placing it in second place, but also discovered the first use of the term in my blog a few months ago! From outsourcing to outgoing. Each of us is an Expert! why do we write?
in third place - a reprint in the i-market, in the fourth - in e-commerce
Although he found only 4 results, they are all the most relevant and are located on the primacy.
Google found the most links - 8, and although I placed the i-market reprint in the first place, I almost coped with the task.
MSN did quite well - 5 links, in the first place reprint of fellow countrymen from e-commerce, the original in second place.
And what about domestic search engines? Against the background of foreign success is much more modest. Yandex found only Ukrainian reprints, Rambler-Russian, and Apport - 432 absolutely irrelevant links! :-)
Draw your own conclusions.
He has a rather interesting and instructive story.
I wrote it a month and a half ago, when I actively corresponded with some development teams, in an attempt to give a hint of my ideas, and published on my website sozday.info/wiki/124/85
(The project is still in the sandbox, I do not temporarily deal with it)
What was my surprise when after a while I saw my article on e-commerce.com.ua/3759
with reference to the mythical Webplanet !!!
Well, then it was reprinted from there www.i-market.ru/news.php?id=7070 with reference to e-commerce, etc.
Naturally, all my complaints of injustice were ignored.
In this regard, taking this opportunity, it is interesting to study how search engines learned to identify the source and duplication of content.
Since in my article I used the terms I had invented to denote non-existent services, the search naturally gave a very limited number of results.
The winner in this category was, oddly enough, Yahoo!
He not only found the source, placing it in second place, but also discovered the first use of the term in my blog a few months ago! From outsourcing to outgoing. Each of us is an Expert! why do we write?
in third place - a reprint in the i-market, in the fourth - in e-commerce
Although he found only 4 results, they are all the most relevant and are located on the primacy.
Google found the most links - 8, and although I placed the i-market reprint in the first place, I almost coped with the task.
MSN did quite well - 5 links, in the first place reprint of fellow countrymen from e-commerce, the original in second place.
And what about domestic search engines? Against the background of foreign success is much more modest. Yandex found only Ukrainian reprints, Rambler-Russian, and Apport - 432 absolutely irrelevant links! :-)
Draw your own conclusions.
')
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/612/
All Articles