Inspired. About integrity.

Recently I got into an interesting situation, such that I had to think about the philosophical category of “integrity” :)

And here is the conclusion I came to for myself: the rule “there are no incorruptible people, there are only small sums” is not true in all cases.
An important limitation is the trust of the bribed person to the bribe taker!

From here, I concluded that the incorruptible is not the one who has no price at all (we leave the saints behind brackets).
He is incorruptible, whose personal assessment of the value of the bribe of which exceeds his own assessment of the possible "benefit of someone from his bribe."
')
Example. Vasya considers it possible to “bribe-sell” for miles.
At the same time, he believes that the service shovel, which they want to snitch by his bribing, is clearly not worth a milen.
This means that Vasya is incorruptible because he simply will not believe the person who offers him a bribe for a spade in miles.

In short, bribing is a delicate matter!

I do not even know why I am ...

PS I wonder why this post constantly scores. Was -2 now -3? Explain one thread, I will be very grateful!