Taiwanese ISP will cut the channel P2P-users
In Taiwan, adopted new legislation , which spelled out in detail the sanctions for users of P2P networks. At the same time, a massive advertising campaign on TV is launched in the country, explaining the problem of piracy for society.
Under the new law, providers are relieved of all responsibility for the distribution of counterfeit in their networks, but they now have to monitor the actions of users and apply the rule of three warnings to users seen in illegal activity. After the third warning, the ISP should limit the Internet access of the offending user - reduce the speed of the incoming / outgoing channel or completely disconnect it from the Network. In theory, this rule is aimed at the quick shutdown of active siders, without waiting for bureaucratic procedures.
It is not entirely clear yet whether providers are obliged to transfer personal details of violators to corporations-owners for legal proceedings. The law is not spelled out directly. Apparently, this is possible only if the user submits an official protest against the actions of the provider, that is, he initiates a trial.
')
A similar approach (removal of responsibility from the ISP and the rule of three warnings for users) is now being considered for adoption in several other countries, including France, although there it has already caused a harsh public aversion.
Under the new law, providers are relieved of all responsibility for the distribution of counterfeit in their networks, but they now have to monitor the actions of users and apply the rule of three warnings to users seen in illegal activity. After the third warning, the ISP should limit the Internet access of the offending user - reduce the speed of the incoming / outgoing channel or completely disconnect it from the Network. In theory, this rule is aimed at the quick shutdown of active siders, without waiting for bureaucratic procedures.
It is not entirely clear yet whether providers are obliged to transfer personal details of violators to corporations-owners for legal proceedings. The law is not spelled out directly. Apparently, this is possible only if the user submits an official protest against the actions of the provider, that is, he initiates a trial.
')
A similar approach (removal of responsibility from the ISP and the rule of three warnings for users) is now being considered for adoption in several other countries, including France, although there it has already caused a harsh public aversion.
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/58451/
All Articles