Creation of sites in Nizhny Novgorod
In that year, when he was not yet in the field, he wrote a very interesting, in my opinion, review of Internet companies in Nizhny Novgorod. This year, closer to autumn, I plan to write a new one (this is quite laborious work).
The relevance of this review has not changed much. So I decided to post it here.
Yes, by the way, I also created a blog “Nizhny Novgorod”, in which, as interesting IT events in our city arrive, I will (perhaps someone too) write here.
')
I have long wanted to write a review article dedicated to the market participants of the creators of sites in Nizhny Novgorod. And, as promised earlier, I keep my word and present this article.
I thought and thought how best to present information. After all, there are a lot of companies involved in creating websites in Nizhny. Therefore, I tried to break up the company into several groups.
I also decided not to put our company on this list, so as not to be accused of bias or other such bad things :) And I didn’t want to create the group “Best of the best” because of one of our companies;) So you You can create it yourself according to our work :)
All the criteria, except for "Design" I found on the websites of companies, i.e. in free access. I want to note that I evaluated the design by 10 systems, and for each group separately. Those. 10 points in “Ze Best” and 10 points in “Golden mean - 1 grade” are different 10 points! Evaluation of the design - this is my IMHO, with which, perhaps, many will argue. But since I am the author of the article, then sorry, we argue in the article's articles. With sharp arguments, the text of the article may vary. So let's get started!
Total companies: 61
I. The Best
8 companies. In my opinion, in this section the best companies of Nizhny Novgorod are selected that work in the market of creating websites.
mohito.ru
One of the best (if not the best) site development companies. Great designs, great programming. Prices are also good :) Based on the company's website data, the simplest site will cost 40.700 rubles, and the most complex site 172.700 rubles. Very reasonable prices. This company also entered the 100 best Internet companies of Runet. Only among the Nizhny Novgorod companies. Well done!
Studio "Morizo"
Very interesting studio. The first of the Nizhny Novgorod companies works with pixelart, which is shown on the company's website. There are interesting offers for travel agencies . They are partners of Yandex, Google and Runner. High-quality team. The cost of work - from 17.000 rubles, but there is another option ala "site-card" for 10.000 rubles.
Piranha Design
The most scandalous studio of Nizhny Novgorod, judging by the discussions in city forums. Winner of various awards. On the site in the best traditions of the scandalous studio there is a section " Porn " :) One of the most famous works of the studio is the design of the site " All Nizhny Novgorod ".
Titanium
My acquaintance with this company, probably, like many of Nizhny Novgorod, happened with the creation of the first site, “SetNNN” (which is no longer functioning). I especially remember this acquaintance, because at that time he worked as an editor for the website of the Volga TV company, and I was wondering how competitors would work :). Since then (and this is far in 2005), the company has released many more beautiful and high-quality works, such as design for content projects J-drive, J-radio. I also really liked the site for the company "Open Mainland". This year Titanium has not yet released anything (judging by the portfolio), but I think it will be released. Apparently something cooked hard.
Colorlab
Not a very well-known company in Nizhny Novgorod (at least I learned about this company only while writing the article), but for the quality of my work I got into the Best Best for a reason. Custom design, interesting approaches. Creative. Recently it was heard about them even throughout Russia, during an election campaign due to the creation of the site " Against all ". I think in the future, we will hear about this company more often.
Studio Egor Chernorukov
It was also a discovery for me that there is a studio in Nizhny such as “Studio of Egor Chernorukov”. Great work. Lebedev in his youth.
m2media
Very famous Nizhny Novgorod web studio. One of the oldest. When most of the current online companies still walked under the table, they already worked! And they did well! A huge portfolio of about 100 works (although if you count them by portfolio, there are 46 of them). If you see their logo in copyrights on one site, then the site “wow” and “super” is a fact. The cost of creating sites in m2media from 60.000 rubles.
Graphit
One of the oldest and most famous companies in Nizhny Novgorod. More than 150 completed projects, which are now among the most popular sites of the city of Ingushetia. The content management system TreeGraph is known far beyond the borders of Nizhny Novgorod. Graphit did everything that can be done on the Internet. Super professionals. Super team. Judging by the price , the average site costs from 30,000 rubles.
Ii. Golden mean
I divided this rubric into 2 blocks - “Top Grade” and “First Grade”. Those. Companies from both units can claim to be of good quality, but there are still differences between them.
1. Top Grade
13 companies.
Web Mechanics
Quality work. The cost of 40,000 rubles .
P52
The company "P52" is one of the oldest players in the market for creating websites. Vast experience, huge portfolio, excellent well-coordinated team. The only reason why the company did not get into the "Best", because a lot of sites are done, and quite often "very mediocre" jobs come across, but apparently this is due to the cost of those works. In any case, the “general indicator” has decreased due to this, and did not allow me to put this company on a higher level. As for prices, it is very difficult to say, because all items are sold separately , but if you take the cost of the basic CMS package, you get 40.000 rubles.
Studio Click
I really liked the click studio of their new corporate website. 20 minutes probably climbed :) Well done! The only thing that rastroil - during the in-depth review of the company's website and the work done, it turned out that the sites are working on a free engine "Joomla!", But nowhere do they report about it, and therefore they hide it. But, nevertheless, the quality of work is very decent.
Hatch
The barcode company also uses a free engine called “Drupal”, but they talk about it openly, for which their “karma” rises to “+1” :) Another thing is not clear who they are - “QSEO” as it says logo on the site, or is it still "Stroke", as they say in copyright. The quality of work is very decent. The cost of work on creating a site starts from 28.000 rubles .
Ai Ti Studio
Similarly, the studio "Click" rastroila and this studio. Also, the free Xoops engine is used, and this is also silent. Prices from 18.600 rubles and above .
InterMarket and Sergey Shokurov
Why together? And what is the connection between them? So I did not understand, but they have the same engines. Mb Did someone work before and borrow the engine? Although I may be paranoid :) It does not matter. In any case, the quality of work at these companies is good, high.
Poster
This company has great designers, but, in my opinion, a lot of programming is very lame. About the prices, this company amused me. The “Services and Prices” page is well-written about “services” and there is a link “Calculate the cost of developing a website” to the contacts page :) It is clear :) So they would say that prices are negotiated individually :)
NNRU and NNOV.RU
Again I will unite 2 companies. Work for a long time, work well. They know what a "good site" is, because they themselves are owners of popular city portals and understand how the “money-making site” should look and work. Design "normal" programming level.
EMAY
Last added company in this section. Originally planned to place it at a lower level, since could not find a portfolio on the site. But still I barely made it. What says is not a plus, of course, to the usability of this company. But, nevertheless, the company works on the quality engine from Graphit. Design is good. The cost of 12.000 to 32.000 rubles.
2. First grade
20 companies.
I will comment on some companies.
lab.visual
Interesting company. Interesting design. Love the web 2.0. The cost of sites from 20,000 to 50,000 rubles, portals from 60,000 rubles.
Softtime
Great programmers. Also our hosting partners. Limping, in my opinion, only the design.
Graff
Very high quality company. And from a technical point of view, and design. Would have been a higher level if it had not embarrassed me their portfolio. And not the quality of the portfolio (everything is fine with this) but the dates of the creation of the websites ... i.e. The last site in the portfolio since last year. Why? Just hands (I hope) did not reach, or what? .. It is not clear.
Burbon
It is interesting, but only my association is on the corporate site of Burbon, that when you point to the “work” icon (red folder), then the icon is very similar to the button accordion?))) Um ... but I left the topic :) The engine is good. Design ... there is some normal work :)
NN-Media
It is a pity that since I worked there (as the head of the Internet department, about 4 years ago) nothing has changed. Either all flowed into another company, and all the work is laid out in another place.
Iii. Hmm ...
14 companies. Here, even the table did not want to do. As they say "know comments".
MVT-NN
Rnn
Contact
Web consulting
PC-NN
Web nn
Business web
F100
CyberLocman
Art NN
Nixup
VT-Studio
Matex
Studio 7
Iv. It is clear ... ©
4 companies. Companies that do not know where to define. It seems to be something good, but something is wrong. There is no portfolio in principle, then the corporate site causes not very positive emotions.
Volga-Soft
The first incomprehensible to me company. Corporate site design ... um ... so-so in general. Portfolio ... also some questions. One of the first sites in the portfolio is www.nais.su , but we already know that the design was made by another company (I already wrote about this above). The copyright on this site is also not worth it. Of the first 10 sites in the portfolio, more than half do not work, and only on 2 I found links that these guys did. Is that - modesty? Or something else? .. Then about the engines - they are always different. I found the graphite engine, then other different engines ... in a word - it is not clear ...
m-com
Also not entirely clear company. Did not find a portfolio as such.
Delta technology
Although it seems like the site is sane, and the words are correct written. And there is even an entrance for customers. And the portfolio is from 11 works (half does not work). But something confuses me in this company. I do not understand that ...
Lucky buyer
No portfolio on the site. Although the site of the company is very decent. Even the cost is indicated: from 25,000 to 46,000 rubles. But there is no portfolio - no chairs ©.
V. flasher
2 companies. I would like to single out a separate item to companies that, for the most part, make websites on a flash or with a very large use of flash.
Design4
Very high quality Nizhny Novgorod flash. About 30 works . As the company's website is broadcasting, they were founded in 1928 :) Good humor :)
NN site
A company that could easily get into the "golden mean - the highest grade." But because of the abundance of flush on his website and on the customers website, he decided to allocate them separately to this group. The cost of the work starts from 7.000 rubles, 30.000 rubles and more go on. In portfolio about 90 works . The works are decent, but there are drawbacks: I looked at the 17 "monitor in firefox - the lower scroll bar, often spreads the design. But, in general, very good.
Everything! :)
From all the information, you can make a few "Tops".
For example, the top 10 - who made the most sites.
1. Graphit - 200 works.
2. Ai-pi-three - 150 works .
3. Sergey Shokurov - about 100 works.
4. Almadesta - 90 works.
5. P52 - 75 works.
6. Click Studio - 63 works.
7. Web Mechanics - 60 works.
8. InterMarket - 58 works.
9.SoftArt - 56 works.
10. Mohito.Ru - 51 work.
It is possible to do various other "Tops", but it will be another topic :) Therefore, I’m finishing up on this solemn minute. It will be interesting to listen to the comments!
The relevance of this review has not changed much. So I decided to post it here.
Yes, by the way, I also created a blog “Nizhny Novgorod”, in which, as interesting IT events in our city arrive, I will (perhaps someone too) write here.
')
I have long wanted to write a review article dedicated to the market participants of the creators of sites in Nizhny Novgorod. And, as promised earlier, I keep my word and present this article.
I thought and thought how best to present information. After all, there are a lot of companies involved in creating websites in Nizhny. Therefore, I tried to break up the company into several groups.
I also decided not to put our company on this list, so as not to be accused of bias or other such bad things :) And I didn’t want to create the group “Best of the best” because of one of our companies;) So you You can create it yourself according to our work :)
All the criteria, except for "Design" I found on the websites of companies, i.e. in free access. I want to note that I evaluated the design by 10 systems, and for each group separately. Those. 10 points in “Ze Best” and 10 points in “Golden mean - 1 grade” are different 10 points! Evaluation of the design - this is my IMHO, with which, perhaps, many will argue. But since I am the author of the article, then sorry, we argue in the article's articles. With sharp arguments, the text of the article may vary. So let's get started!
Total companies: 61
I. The Best
8 companies. In my opinion, in this section the best companies of Nizhny Novgorod are selected that work in the market of creating websites.
| Title | Design | CMS | Portfolio | Appeared |
| Mohito.Ru | ten | LegoSITE III | 51 jobs | 2004 |
| Morisot | ten | Edma | 31 jobs | 2003 |
| Piranha Design | 9 | Your aspx engine | 23 works | 2005 |
| Titanium | 9 | Own engine | 21 jobs | 2005 |
| Colorab | eight | Own engine | 17 works | 2006 |
| Studio Egor Chernorukov | eight | Own engine | 27 works | 2002 |
| m2media | eight | Own engine | 46 works | 1998 |
| Graphit | eight | TreeGraph | about 200 works | 1998 |
mohito.ru
One of the best (if not the best) site development companies. Great designs, great programming. Prices are also good :) Based on the company's website data, the simplest site will cost 40.700 rubles, and the most complex site 172.700 rubles. Very reasonable prices. This company also entered the 100 best Internet companies of Runet. Only among the Nizhny Novgorod companies. Well done!
Studio "Morizo"
Very interesting studio. The first of the Nizhny Novgorod companies works with pixelart, which is shown on the company's website. There are interesting offers for travel agencies . They are partners of Yandex, Google and Runner. High-quality team. The cost of work - from 17.000 rubles, but there is another option ala "site-card" for 10.000 rubles.
Piranha Design
The most scandalous studio of Nizhny Novgorod, judging by the discussions in city forums. Winner of various awards. On the site in the best traditions of the scandalous studio there is a section " Porn " :) One of the most famous works of the studio is the design of the site " All Nizhny Novgorod ".
Titanium
My acquaintance with this company, probably, like many of Nizhny Novgorod, happened with the creation of the first site, “SetNNN” (which is no longer functioning). I especially remember this acquaintance, because at that time he worked as an editor for the website of the Volga TV company, and I was wondering how competitors would work :). Since then (and this is far in 2005), the company has released many more beautiful and high-quality works, such as design for content projects J-drive, J-radio. I also really liked the site for the company "Open Mainland". This year Titanium has not yet released anything (judging by the portfolio), but I think it will be released. Apparently something cooked hard.
Colorlab
Not a very well-known company in Nizhny Novgorod (at least I learned about this company only while writing the article), but for the quality of my work I got into the Best Best for a reason. Custom design, interesting approaches. Creative. Recently it was heard about them even throughout Russia, during an election campaign due to the creation of the site " Against all ". I think in the future, we will hear about this company more often.
Studio Egor Chernorukov
It was also a discovery for me that there is a studio in Nizhny such as “Studio of Egor Chernorukov”. Great work. Lebedev in his youth.
m2media
Very famous Nizhny Novgorod web studio. One of the oldest. When most of the current online companies still walked under the table, they already worked! And they did well! A huge portfolio of about 100 works (although if you count them by portfolio, there are 46 of them). If you see their logo in copyrights on one site, then the site “wow” and “super” is a fact. The cost of creating sites in m2media from 60.000 rubles.
Graphit
One of the oldest and most famous companies in Nizhny Novgorod. More than 150 completed projects, which are now among the most popular sites of the city of Ingushetia. The content management system TreeGraph is known far beyond the borders of Nizhny Novgorod. Graphit did everything that can be done on the Internet. Super professionals. Super team. Judging by the price , the average site costs from 30,000 rubles.
Ii. Golden mean
I divided this rubric into 2 blocks - “Top Grade” and “First Grade”. Those. Companies from both units can claim to be of good quality, but there are still differences between them.
1. Top Grade
13 companies.
| Title | Design | CMS | Portfolio | Appeared |
| Web mechanic | 9 | Own engine | 60 works | 2002 |
| P52 | 7 | Brane CMS | 75 works | 2000 |
| I-pi-three | 9 | Your aspx engine | about 150 works | 2001 |
| Studio Click | eight | Joomla! | 63 works | 2003 |
| SoftArt | eight | CMS SiteSet | 56 works | 2003 |
| Hatch | 9 | Cms drupal | 30 works | 2004 |
| Ai Ti Studio | 7 | Xoops | 35 works | 2006 |
| Shokurov Sergey | eight | Own engine. | more than 100 works | 2000 |
| InterMarket | 7 | Own engine. | 58 works | 2002 |
| Poster | 9 | Own engine | 14 works | 2007 |
| N.N.RU | 7 | SiteDNK | No accurate data. From the presented On the site - 22 works . | 1999 |
| NNOV.RU | eight | InfoSite | 30 works | 2005 |
| EMAY | 7 | TreeGraph | 30 works | 2006 |
Web Mechanics
Quality work. The cost of 40,000 rubles .
P52
The company "P52" is one of the oldest players in the market for creating websites. Vast experience, huge portfolio, excellent well-coordinated team. The only reason why the company did not get into the "Best", because a lot of sites are done, and quite often "very mediocre" jobs come across, but apparently this is due to the cost of those works. In any case, the “general indicator” has decreased due to this, and did not allow me to put this company on a higher level. As for prices, it is very difficult to say, because all items are sold separately , but if you take the cost of the basic CMS package, you get 40.000 rubles.
Studio Click
I really liked the click studio of their new corporate website. 20 minutes probably climbed :) Well done! The only thing that rastroil - during the in-depth review of the company's website and the work done, it turned out that the sites are working on a free engine "Joomla!", But nowhere do they report about it, and therefore they hide it. But, nevertheless, the quality of work is very decent.
Hatch
The barcode company also uses a free engine called “Drupal”, but they talk about it openly, for which their “karma” rises to “+1” :) Another thing is not clear who they are - “QSEO” as it says logo on the site, or is it still "Stroke", as they say in copyright. The quality of work is very decent. The cost of work on creating a site starts from 28.000 rubles .
Ai Ti Studio
Similarly, the studio "Click" rastroila and this studio. Also, the free Xoops engine is used, and this is also silent. Prices from 18.600 rubles and above .
InterMarket and Sergey Shokurov
Why together? And what is the connection between them? So I did not understand, but they have the same engines. Mb Did someone work before and borrow the engine? Although I may be paranoid :) It does not matter. In any case, the quality of work at these companies is good, high.
Poster
This company has great designers, but, in my opinion, a lot of programming is very lame. About the prices, this company amused me. The “Services and Prices” page is well-written about “services” and there is a link “Calculate the cost of developing a website” to the contacts page :) It is clear :) So they would say that prices are negotiated individually :)
NNRU and NNOV.RU
Again I will unite 2 companies. Work for a long time, work well. They know what a "good site" is, because they themselves are owners of popular city portals and understand how the “money-making site” should look and work. Design "normal" programming level.
EMAY
Last added company in this section. Originally planned to place it at a lower level, since could not find a portfolio on the site. But still I barely made it. What says is not a plus, of course, to the usability of this company. But, nevertheless, the company works on the quality engine from Graphit. Design is good. The cost of 12.000 to 32.000 rubles.
2. First grade
20 companies.
| Title | Design | CMS | Portfolio | Appeared |
| Lab. Visual | 7 | Joomla! | 30 works | 2004 |
| Softtime | 6 | Own engine | about 50 works | 2003 |
| Graff | 9 | 1C-Bitrix , Amiro.CMS | 45 works | 2000 |
| R-site | 7 | Own engine | 20 works | 2006 |
| Burbon | 7 | 1C-Bitrix | 20 works | 2005 |
| Brand | 7 | - | 34 works | 2003 |
| Click | eight | - | 10 works (not all) | 2007 |
| Simpo design | 7 | 1C-Bitrix | 25 works | 2006 |
| Triart | five | Joomla! | 8 works | 2005 |
| Salex-studio | 7 | Salex CMS | 11 works | 2006 |
| NN-Media | 6 | Own engine | 8 works | 2005 |
| Seonn | 6 | - | 7 works | 2007 |
| Dast-studio | five | DLE , UMI.CMS , etc. | 15 works | 2004 |
| Double standard | 7 | CMSdss, your engine. | 10 works | 2006 |
| Internet development | five | - | 50 works | 2003 |
| NetCat N. Novgorod | 7 | Netcat | 6 works | 2005 |
| Ocean | 7 | - | 13 works | 2007 |
| Web [52] | 7 | Own engine | 30 works | 2006 |
| Almadesta | eight | Own engine | 90 works | 2001 |
| Ilab | 6 | Own engine | 17 works | 2000 |
I will comment on some companies.
lab.visual
Interesting company. Interesting design. Love the web 2.0. The cost of sites from 20,000 to 50,000 rubles, portals from 60,000 rubles.
Softtime
Great programmers. Also our hosting partners. Limping, in my opinion, only the design.
Graff
Very high quality company. And from a technical point of view, and design. Would have been a higher level if it had not embarrassed me their portfolio. And not the quality of the portfolio (everything is fine with this) but the dates of the creation of the websites ... i.e. The last site in the portfolio since last year. Why? Just hands (I hope) did not reach, or what? .. It is not clear.
Burbon
It is interesting, but only my association is on the corporate site of Burbon, that when you point to the “work” icon (red folder), then the icon is very similar to the button accordion?))) Um ... but I left the topic :) The engine is good. Design ... there is some normal work :)
NN-Media
It is a pity that since I worked there (as the head of the Internet department, about 4 years ago) nothing has changed. Either all flowed into another company, and all the work is laid out in another place.
Iii. Hmm ...
14 companies. Here, even the table did not want to do. As they say "know comments".
MVT-NN
Rnn
Contact
Web consulting
PC-NN
Web nn
Business web
F100
CyberLocman
Art NN
Nixup
VT-Studio
Matex
Studio 7
Iv. It is clear ... ©
4 companies. Companies that do not know where to define. It seems to be something good, but something is wrong. There is no portfolio in principle, then the corporate site causes not very positive emotions.
Volga-Soft
The first incomprehensible to me company. Corporate site design ... um ... so-so in general. Portfolio ... also some questions. One of the first sites in the portfolio is www.nais.su , but we already know that the design was made by another company (I already wrote about this above). The copyright on this site is also not worth it. Of the first 10 sites in the portfolio, more than half do not work, and only on 2 I found links that these guys did. Is that - modesty? Or something else? .. Then about the engines - they are always different. I found the graphite engine, then other different engines ... in a word - it is not clear ...
m-com
Also not entirely clear company. Did not find a portfolio as such.
Delta technology
Although it seems like the site is sane, and the words are correct written. And there is even an entrance for customers. And the portfolio is from 11 works (half does not work). But something confuses me in this company. I do not understand that ...
Lucky buyer
No portfolio on the site. Although the site of the company is very decent. Even the cost is indicated: from 25,000 to 46,000 rubles. But there is no portfolio - no chairs ©.
V. flasher
2 companies. I would like to single out a separate item to companies that, for the most part, make websites on a flash or with a very large use of flash.
Design4
Very high quality Nizhny Novgorod flash. About 30 works . As the company's website is broadcasting, they were founded in 1928 :) Good humor :)
NN site
A company that could easily get into the "golden mean - the highest grade." But because of the abundance of flush on his website and on the customers website, he decided to allocate them separately to this group. The cost of the work starts from 7.000 rubles, 30.000 rubles and more go on. In portfolio about 90 works . The works are decent, but there are drawbacks: I looked at the 17 "monitor in firefox - the lower scroll bar, often spreads the design. But, in general, very good.
Everything! :)
From all the information, you can make a few "Tops".
For example, the top 10 - who made the most sites.
1. Graphit - 200 works.
2. Ai-pi-three - 150 works .
3. Sergey Shokurov - about 100 works.
4. Almadesta - 90 works.
5. P52 - 75 works.
6. Click Studio - 63 works.
7. Web Mechanics - 60 works.
8. InterMarket - 58 works.
9.SoftArt - 56 works.
10. Mohito.Ru - 51 work.
It is possible to do various other "Tops", but it will be another topic :) Therefore, I’m finishing up on this solemn minute. It will be interesting to listen to the comments!
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/57144/
All Articles