Selection of SMS billing under the route

In the process of selecting SMS billing under the route, I came across this review: allpublication.ru/sms
A handy thing, but the column “billing commission or how much a partner gets” is about anything at all.
I decided to look at the tariffs and compare.



To begin with, I calculated the distribution of payments by operators.
For this, info about 33154 payments of one Russian service was used. Sanchez, respect :)
Here are the top5 operators:

operator	payment percentage
MTS	33.78
Megafon	21.21
Beeline	11.59
UMC	6.64
KievStar	4.69

')
Then for this top five I collected the tariffs of all billing for a 5-dollar SMS.
Where there was no such tariff, the closest one fitted. In the course eliminated:

• smspartner.ru - site not available
• pokazun.ru/ - did not find tariffs
• goldfon.ru - incomprehensible tariffs in Ukraine, the rest below average
• smsmedia.ru - cloudy rates
• i-free.ru - did not find tariffs

It turned out like this:

billing	mts	megafon	beeline	umc	kievstar
smsmoney.tv	82.86	65.32	87.15	38.92	42.1
geopay.ru	70.45	60.57	87.62	28.34	42.64
a1agregator.ru	99.9	70.6	94.6	42.3	52.9
cmcbilling.ru	77.72	72.42	97.09	36.75	39.57
smsrent.ru	81.66	63.87	84.23	55.85	65.56
smszamok.ru	99.01	73.5	92.63	54	54
mobilcent.ru	89	73.8	94.8	57	57
smsonline.ru	59.5	59.5	59.5	59.5	59.5
smscoin.com	82.1	66.3	87.59	60	60
smsdostup.ru	101.43	72.19	96.17	43.85	54.43

Then, for each billing, I calculated the average revenue per SMS: amounts (operator's tariff * operator's percent) / number of operators.

billing	Wed SMS income ($ 5)
smsdostup.ru	66.19
smszamok.ru	65.89
a1agregator.ru	64.97
mobilcent.ru	63.16
smscoin.com	58.75
smsrent.ru	57.68
cmcbilling.ru	57.16
smsmoney.tv	56.5
geopay.ru	50.68
smsonline.ru	46.36

Well, I counted as a percentage of the leader’s profitability:

billing	yield,%
smsdostup.ru	100
smszamok.ru	99.55
a1agregator.ru	98.16
mobilcent.ru	95.42
smscoin.com	88.76
smsrent.ru	87.14
cmcbilling.ru	86.36
smsmoney.tv	85.36
geopay.ru	76.57
smsonline.ru	70.04

Now it remains to look at the top:

• smsdostup.ru - acquaintances, good reviews. With good traffic, they increase the percentage and give prefixes better.
• smszamok.ru - none of my friends used. There is no license for the provision of telematic services, but the age is respectable. The person paying the overhead and costs is the user. For nat, passport data must be specified in the account settings.
• a1agregator.ru - according to reviews of friends a year ago, terribly shaven + this muddy story with RB.
• mobilcent.ru - the person paying overhead costs and costs - the user. Young.

As a result, the title of the correct SMS billing is awarded to: smsdostup.ru .
UP: and my reflink to boot.

If someone did not count, poke, please :)