 Recall the essence of these tools (they are shown in the figure). The Gantt chart highlights the work that needs to be done, with their durations and interconnections. The scale can be different - you can view the relationship and individual elementary operations, and the entire project phases. Programs for project management make it easy to manipulate the schedule and answer questions like "How to change the project end date, if such an operation takes so much more time than we expected?"
 Recall the essence of these tools (they are shown in the figure). The Gantt chart highlights the work that needs to be done, with their durations and interconnections. The scale can be different - you can view the relationship and individual elementary operations, and the entire project phases. Programs for project management make it easy to manipulate the schedule and answer questions like "How to change the project end date, if such an operation takes so much more time than we expected?" 1. We determine the time budget available at our disposal (in other words, the available amount of resources). We have a total of 24 hours a day. Of these, some need to be allocated for sleep and stuff, so much we can plan for work affairs. At the same time, it is usually advised to plan no more than 60% of the working time, which fully fits in with the concept of reserves in project management, allowing you to calmly respond to unforeseen circumstances. In principle, parts of the day related to sleep and rest can also be considered as reserves for extreme cases. But after successfully overcoming an extreme situation, one must not forget to restore the corresponding reserves of health, not to allow the accumulation of long-term fatigue.
 1. We determine the time budget available at our disposal (in other words, the available amount of resources). We have a total of 24 hours a day. Of these, some need to be allocated for sleep and stuff, so much we can plan for work affairs. At the same time, it is usually advised to plan no more than 60% of the working time, which fully fits in with the concept of reserves in project management, allowing you to calmly respond to unforeseen circumstances. In principle, parts of the day related to sleep and rest can also be considered as reserves for extreme cases. But after successfully overcoming an extreme situation, one must not forget to restore the corresponding reserves of health, not to allow the accumulation of long-term fatigue. 2. Schedule deadlines (critical deadlines). It should be said that the proposed schedule is most useful in the following circumstances:
 2. Schedule deadlines (critical deadlines). It should be said that the proposed schedule is most useful in the following circumstances: 3. Making a “tablecloth layout” - the distribution of the available budget of time between different cases. We divide the estimated labor costs in hours by the number of days during which we can deal with this matter (based on how many days are left until the critical time, how difficult this matter is to be “concentrated” in time - an important indicator for creative tasks, etc. ) We get the number of hours per day that we have to spend on this matter in order to be in time by the required date. We have higher priority issues, i.e. we make time for them first, the rest are “financed” by the residual principle. We try to keep reserves - 40% of unplanned time for unforeseen external circumstances and our own spontaneous activity. We take into account the principles of harmonization of time expenditures described above.
 3. Making a “tablecloth layout” - the distribution of the available budget of time between different cases. We divide the estimated labor costs in hours by the number of days during which we can deal with this matter (based on how many days are left until the critical time, how difficult this matter is to be “concentrated” in time - an important indicator for creative tasks, etc. ) We get the number of hours per day that we have to spend on this matter in order to be in time by the required date. We have higher priority issues, i.e. we make time for them first, the rest are “financed” by the residual principle. We try to keep reserves - 40% of unplanned time for unforeseen external circumstances and our own spontaneous activity. We take into account the principles of harmonization of time expenditures described above. Rationing time is the basis for planning and control. If you conduct continuous or selective timekeeping, gradually you will accumulate a base of standards for various types of tasks. In personal work, it would be too time-consuming rationing of elementary operations, as is done in project management; but very good results can be given by rationing the time spent on typical projects. For example, working on a quarterly report, you get the appropriate "project card" in which you record all your time expenses for this project, as well as the duration of work on it. The latter is no less important than the cost of time, because Many works, especially creative ones, require a certain level of “blurring” in time, and this will need to be taken into account when planning. In addition, in the "project card" it is appropriate to reflect the division of work into several main classes. The determination of the necessary standards for planning can be made for each of these classes separately, or simply, in relation to the scope of the project. For example, in the card shown in the figure, individual standards for schemes could not be calculated, but the amount of time required for the schemes could be related to the volume of the project in signs, assuming that in other similar projects the proportion of time spent on schemes would be about the same as and in this.
 Rationing time is the basis for planning and control. If you conduct continuous or selective timekeeping, gradually you will accumulate a base of standards for various types of tasks. In personal work, it would be too time-consuming rationing of elementary operations, as is done in project management; but very good results can be given by rationing the time spent on typical projects. For example, working on a quarterly report, you get the appropriate "project card" in which you record all your time expenses for this project, as well as the duration of work on it. The latter is no less important than the cost of time, because Many works, especially creative ones, require a certain level of “blurring” in time, and this will need to be taken into account when planning. In addition, in the "project card" it is appropriate to reflect the division of work into several main classes. The determination of the necessary standards for planning can be made for each of these classes separately, or simply, in relation to the scope of the project. For example, in the card shown in the figure, individual standards for schemes could not be calculated, but the amount of time required for the schemes could be related to the volume of the project in signs, assuming that in other similar projects the proportion of time spent on schemes would be about the same as and in this. The control of the project execution is carried out by comparing the achieved with the planned, in particular - the real labor productivity with the normative one. In project management, as part of the Earned Value Analysis technology, there are a large number of indicators that allow assessing the degree of deviation of the actual project performance indicators from the planned ones. For the purposes of your personal work, the method is quite intuitive: by assessing your productivity at the completed project stage, you recalculate the estimated amount of time you need to complete the remaining stages. Since time costs tend to increase rather than decrease, the resource calendar schedule recalculating the time spent on a project is likely to be reflected by the “thickening” of the corresponding “flap”, which will require adjustments to the overall time budget, and possibly restructuring the action program. For example, in Figure 2, the second draft, supplanted by the first, may require delegation (including the purchase of an external service), etc.
 The control of the project execution is carried out by comparing the achieved with the planned, in particular - the real labor productivity with the normative one. In project management, as part of the Earned Value Analysis technology, there are a large number of indicators that allow assessing the degree of deviation of the actual project performance indicators from the planned ones. For the purposes of your personal work, the method is quite intuitive: by assessing your productivity at the completed project stage, you recalculate the estimated amount of time you need to complete the remaining stages. Since time costs tend to increase rather than decrease, the resource calendar schedule recalculating the time spent on a project is likely to be reflected by the “thickening” of the corresponding “flap”, which will require adjustments to the overall time budget, and possibly restructuring the action program. For example, in Figure 2, the second draft, supplanted by the first, may require delegation (including the purchase of an external service), etc. We generalize and systematize. To maximize the effectiveness of the various approaches to planning described in the article, it remains to show their logical relationship. To do this, we first introduce the distinction between the project and the program, as it is usually understood in the system-sequential methodology (SMDM). The project (in the diagram on the right) can be represented as a “converging” funnel directed towards a specific goal. The arrows indicate the means converging to this goal, resources, subtasks. The program (in the diagram on the left) can be represented as a “diverging” funnel. The program does not have a specific goal, there is only a set of goals, enough abstract landmarks. The arrows show the internal and external capabilities that determine the direction of movement from the starting point.
 We generalize and systematize. To maximize the effectiveness of the various approaches to planning described in the article, it remains to show their logical relationship. To do this, we first introduce the distinction between the project and the program, as it is usually understood in the system-sequential methodology (SMDM). The project (in the diagram on the right) can be represented as a “converging” funnel directed towards a specific goal. The arrows indicate the means converging to this goal, resources, subtasks. The program (in the diagram on the left) can be represented as a “diverging” funnel. The program does not have a specific goal, there is only a set of goals, enough abstract landmarks. The arrows show the internal and external capabilities that determine the direction of movement from the starting point. An example of a program is a personal strategic plan, designed using attention structuring. The farther away from the focus of attention, the less “projectable” the pointers to cases contained in the system become, the more ideas, objectives, etc. appear. constructions that set not a clearly defined result, but a certain set of possible directions of movement and development, far from each of which is destined to become embodied. But the existence of this set makes it easy to relate the opportunities provided by the external environment with their own desires, and to choose the optimal path for further movement; in particular - to formulate specific goals for the near future.
 An example of a program is a personal strategic plan, designed using attention structuring. The farther away from the focus of attention, the less “projectable” the pointers to cases contained in the system become, the more ideas, objectives, etc. appear. constructions that set not a clearly defined result, but a certain set of possible directions of movement and development, far from each of which is destined to become embodied. But the existence of this set makes it easy to relate the opportunities provided by the external environment with their own desires, and to choose the optimal path for further movement; in particular - to formulate specific goals for the near future. This “strategic” program approach based on attention structuring is naturally combined with a “tactical”, project-based approach. In the figure, the operational level of the program, close to the initial planning moment, is filled with clear projects (interlinked in the calendar and resource plan). More distant projects that are in the “strategic preconscious” zone have not yet been drawn up, most likely these are only plans and folders with thoughts that are about ideas. And finally, the “strategic subconscious”, a distant perspective, is not yet clear. It is set only by fairly abstract targets and key areas, and, perhaps, by a bold strategic goal. There are no clear, measurable steps to it (otherwise it would not be impudent), but thanks to the program approach you will not miss the opportunities that bring it closer, but thanks to the project approach you will use these opportunities 100%.
 This “strategic” program approach based on attention structuring is naturally combined with a “tactical”, project-based approach. In the figure, the operational level of the program, close to the initial planning moment, is filled with clear projects (interlinked in the calendar and resource plan). More distant projects that are in the “strategic preconscious” zone have not yet been drawn up, most likely these are only plans and folders with thoughts that are about ideas. And finally, the “strategic subconscious”, a distant perspective, is not yet clear. It is set only by fairly abstract targets and key areas, and, perhaps, by a bold strategic goal. There are no clear, measurable steps to it (otherwise it would not be impudent), but thanks to the program approach you will not miss the opportunities that bring it closer, but thanks to the project approach you will use these opportunities 100%.Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/5436/
All Articles