Passport of the site
For quite a long time, I have been carrying out the idea of creating a separate page for each site, on which the parameters of the entire site, information about its developers and development platform will be specified.
The idea lingered in my head for a long time and something I had already managed to realize , but as usual, this idea occurred not to me alone. In particular, on the website of the studio “ANTULA” the idea acquired quite specific forms.
Below are the parameters that, in the opinion of the company's employees, should be part of the site’s passport.
')
The only thing in my opinion is to make more detailed information about the developers.
Otherwise, this is a fairly complete list by which you can judge the entire site and, if necessary, contact its developers.
The principal difference between the proposed method and the habitual “copy-paste” is that the information is provided to the user in a certain standardized form and immediately, i.e. it is not necessary as before to open the mail program window to contact the author because most of the information is already displayed on the screen.
The idea lingered in my head for a long time and something I had already managed to realize , but as usual, this idea occurred not to me alone. In particular, on the website of the studio “ANTULA” the idea acquired quite specific forms.
Below are the parameters that, in the opinion of the company's employees, should be part of the site’s passport.
')
- 1. Site name.
- 2.URL site.
- 3. A brief summary of the site.
- 4. Location and contact information about the site hosting.
- 5. Date of site development.
- 6.Owner site.
- 7. Contact information about the site owner.
- 8. Domain Owner (URL).
- 9. Contact information about the owner of the domain.
- 10. Website developer.
- 11. Contact information about the developer site.
- 12. Minimum hardware and software requirements:
- The resolution of the monitors for which the site is optimized.
- The optimal monitor resolution for viewing the site.
- The minimum number of monitor colors on which the site can be viewed.
- The main browser, which will be viewed the site, and its minimum version.
- The average download time for a site at a given Internet connection speed.
- Loading time of the head (home) page of the site.
- 13. Site size, MB.
- 14. The number of html pages.
- 15. Number of site files.
- 16. Number of site hyperlinks:
- The number of internal hyperlinks.
- The number of external hyperlinks.
- The number of pictures of the site.
- 18. Site depth.
- 19. Is it possible to view the site offline, without connecting to the Internet.
- 20. Is the special software required to ensure the site’s proper performance required?
The only thing in my opinion is to make more detailed information about the developers.
- 10. Website developers.
- designer
- coder
- programmer
- Technical Director
Otherwise, this is a fairly complete list by which you can judge the entire site and, if necessary, contact its developers.
The principal difference between the proposed method and the habitual “copy-paste” is that the information is provided to the user in a certain standardized form and immediately, i.e. it is not necessary as before to open the mail program window to contact the author because most of the information is already displayed on the screen.
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/53401/
All Articles