retrospective

start

At first, you painfully react to the criticism of your work, resist, prove and justify yourself.
↓
You love the result of your work and you understand that absolutely bad parts need to be redone. You react to the criticism of trifles (is it really that important?).
↓
When publishing the result, you add reservations - they say they made the first product in a day (although it puffed for 2 weeks) and you are looking for indulgence. Looking for useless praise.
↓
Understand what is done poorly before you finish.
↓
When referring to errors, you understand that they indicate what you yourself are aware of (there was simply no time).
↓
To the question "why does not work," you answer "because it is my mistake."
↓
To the question to yourself “why it does not work” you understand the reason and correct it.
↓
Without knowing how to solve the problem, you openly ask about it. Understanding that I did poorly ask the others how to do better.
↓
Your opinions are clearly argued, but so flexible that, with the best argument, you quickly change your position and do not lose time.
↓
You know what odnoklassniki in navigation is better than linkedin, but you do not prove it.
↓
You rule mistakes behind colleagues and don't tell anyone about it.
↓
You are looking for the root cause of your ultimate goal and think how it can be solved more effectively.
↓
You know that each user of Habrakhabr has passed at least three stages listed above.
↓
...