Improving the quality of articles - add "squeeze" from the comments
I want to suggest a method that will help in some cases significantly improve the quality of articles on Habré.
According to the results of the comments, the authors sometimes supplement and correct the initial version of the publication. But the fact is that many leave everything as is, shifting the responsibility of studying comments to the reader. Of course, comments are often no less (and sometimes more) interesting and valuable than the articles themselves. But it happens that they are written in hundreds, and half is not directly related to the topic. Of course, many useless comments are minus, so you can only read fluently those marked by pluses. But this leads to the effect of the crowd - the most noticeable comments at the top of the tape get more and more advantages, and those who answered later and who have zero so far remain with zero, although sometimes their opinions are no less useful.
I suggest that authors wishing to improve the quality of the article do a kind of “squeeze” - a summary of useful in their opinion remarks and additions that can be placed at the bottom of the article. This will not require any changes in the design of the site. The only thing that is inconvenient is that you will not be able to track such updated articles.
')
Aggregation habramneniya better to do a couple of days after publication, when the majority of comments already expressed.
As an example, I offer you my sample on this topic - at the bottom of the article (unfortunately, I can’t put a link to the fragment - habra editor, it seems, cuts it off).
Opinions about the idea and design are welcome. Thanks for attention.
According to the results of the comments, the authors sometimes supplement and correct the initial version of the publication. But the fact is that many leave everything as is, shifting the responsibility of studying comments to the reader. Of course, comments are often no less (and sometimes more) interesting and valuable than the articles themselves. But it happens that they are written in hundreds, and half is not directly related to the topic. Of course, many useless comments are minus, so you can only read fluently those marked by pluses. But this leads to the effect of the crowd - the most noticeable comments at the top of the tape get more and more advantages, and those who answered later and who have zero so far remain with zero, although sometimes their opinions are no less useful.
I suggest that authors wishing to improve the quality of the article do a kind of “squeeze” - a summary of useful in their opinion remarks and additions that can be placed at the bottom of the article. This will not require any changes in the design of the site. The only thing that is inconvenient is that you will not be able to track such updated articles.
')
Aggregation habramneniya better to do a couple of days after publication, when the majority of comments already expressed.
As an example, I offer you my sample on this topic - at the bottom of the article (unfortunately, I can’t put a link to the fragment - habra editor, it seems, cuts it off).
Opinions about the idea and design are welcome. Thanks for attention.
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/50396/
All Articles