The Ministry of Information and Communications recalled the World Wide Web
Only two pages of dry numbered text, without aplomb, without any information preparation and PR. But the sophisticated reader can immediately identify two features that bring the document to the first position of the rating.
First of all, this is the first order of MinInformSvyaz in history that is absolutely unambiguous about such familiar notions as HTTP, FTP, news feeds, etc. Those. It is on December 11, 2006 that the birth of a state of increased interest in the web can be dated.
Secondly, this document concerns absolutely everyone. If all the previous rules and restrictions related to the sites were somehow only related to paid services in the field of Internet services, then this order does not even hint at defining the scope of its action, which means that it is valid for everyone (at least formally I could not find a single contradiction to this condition). Once again for an inattentive reader - the order does not in any way limit itself; it concerns ALL .
')
Trouble begins immediately with the definitions (part I point 3). There are defined technical means (TS), subject to the specified rules. All definitions contain slang expressions in the right part of the definition and none of them are disclosed either directly or by reference to the corresponding document. The culmination of the first part is a statement about the mandatory declaration of conformity. I leave it to the reader as homework to try to reproduce the situation with the declaration, the form of the declaration and the appeals in case of refusal.
The trouble continues in the second part of the order, where completely different definitions of the vehicle are used than in the first part. If at first a mixture of Soviet argon and modern slang was used, then in the second part we encounter a mixture of legal language with technical terms. For example, “HTTP CTP” (clause 17) and the “Web server” there. What kind of services fall under the "HTTP CU", if all that use the HTTP protocol, then where does the "Web-server" in the general case remain unclear. Also from the document it is not necessary how to declare compliance with distributed implementations of a particular technology. For example, not all mail servers can send mail to a display device after entering identification data. Moreover, a topological diversity is a fairly good practice. Whatever deduction we or you, dear readers, have come from, it clearly does not follow from the document.
A careful study of the rules, even when trying to extrapolate the idea of ​​the creator, there are untranslatable pearls like “receiving files in accordance with the transition command using the hyperlink entered from the Web application, and issuing the corresponding image to the screen.” the ministry.
The order ends on a humorous note. This requires a quote: " List of abbreviations used.
...
9. Web - World Wide Web "
With what, dear friends, I congratulate all of us. But exactly two months before the order I was talking about this here and here , but also during the creation of the GCP .
Optimism is inspired only by the fact that it is completely unclear how Deputy Minister BD Antonyuk will monitor the execution of the order.
I didn’t want to be in trouble, so I didn’t make any thematic predictions for a year, but I’m afraid that 2007 will be the year of the "state's hand in IT". And then it depends on our quickness whether it will turn out “as always” or at least a little mutually beneficial.
First of all, this is the first order of MinInformSvyaz in history that is absolutely unambiguous about such familiar notions as HTTP, FTP, news feeds, etc. Those. It is on December 11, 2006 that the birth of a state of increased interest in the web can be dated.
Secondly, this document concerns absolutely everyone. If all the previous rules and restrictions related to the sites were somehow only related to paid services in the field of Internet services, then this order does not even hint at defining the scope of its action, which means that it is valid for everyone (at least formally I could not find a single contradiction to this condition). Once again for an inattentive reader - the order does not in any way limit itself; it concerns ALL .
')
Trouble begins immediately with the definitions (part I point 3). There are defined technical means (TS), subject to the specified rules. All definitions contain slang expressions in the right part of the definition and none of them are disclosed either directly or by reference to the corresponding document. The culmination of the first part is a statement about the mandatory declaration of conformity. I leave it to the reader as homework to try to reproduce the situation with the declaration, the form of the declaration and the appeals in case of refusal.
The trouble continues in the second part of the order, where completely different definitions of the vehicle are used than in the first part. If at first a mixture of Soviet argon and modern slang was used, then in the second part we encounter a mixture of legal language with technical terms. For example, “HTTP CTP” (clause 17) and the “Web server” there. What kind of services fall under the "HTTP CU", if all that use the HTTP protocol, then where does the "Web-server" in the general case remain unclear. Also from the document it is not necessary how to declare compliance with distributed implementations of a particular technology. For example, not all mail servers can send mail to a display device after entering identification data. Moreover, a topological diversity is a fairly good practice. Whatever deduction we or you, dear readers, have come from, it clearly does not follow from the document.
A careful study of the rules, even when trying to extrapolate the idea of ​​the creator, there are untranslatable pearls like “receiving files in accordance with the transition command using the hyperlink entered from the Web application, and issuing the corresponding image to the screen.” the ministry.
The order ends on a humorous note. This requires a quote: " List of abbreviations used.
...
9. Web - World Wide Web "
With what, dear friends, I congratulate all of us. But exactly two months before the order I was talking about this here and here , but also during the creation of the GCP .
Optimism is inspired only by the fact that it is completely unclear how Deputy Minister BD Antonyuk will monitor the execution of the order.
I didn’t want to be in trouble, so I didn’t make any thematic predictions for a year, but I’m afraid that 2007 will be the year of the "state's hand in IT". And then it depends on our quickness whether it will turn out “as always” or at least a little mutually beneficial.
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/4914/
All Articles