The concept of the mechanism for correcting typos

When participating in any discussions on the Internet, you often come across the fact that it is forbidden to edit your own comments on the resource. Obviously, this is due to the fact that no one could refuse to say the words. But sometimes, editing a comment is not required to hide a different degree of shameful text, but simply to correct the silly typos that each person makes.



Sometimes with quick typing, you can confuse a couple of keys, confuse order, forget the letter, well, plus there are also other minor typos, all familiar. There are mistakes and rougher, but often they are explained not by the illiteracy of the author, but by many other factors. Here that would be useful mechanism for correcting typos. Below the cut, I would like to present my simple concept, which, in my opinion, is applicable on any resource.





Take a look at the picture. Common situation? Several banal and offensive typos. The author is ashamed, but often he just can not do anything. I propose to introduce a mechanism for one-time correction of typos. Let, for example, it is called by the button “Fix typos”. By pressing this button, the author receives a one-time opportunity to correct the text, removing all errors.



However, the result will not be just a text, it will be a text similar to the following:



With this solution:

• the user gets the opportunity to edit typos, and even gross errors, finely edit the text;
• we do not lose the original author's text, the author will not be able to hide anything;
• we see that the author is a competent person who tries to follow his text and corrects mistakes, if any;
• The resulting option will be weak, but teach others how to write correctly, showing an example on basic errors.

UPD : based on the results of the discussion, it was thought: you can display a completely revised version without graphic edits, and by pressing a special button (link) show it in the form suggested in the second figure: with graphic corrections.

')

In my opinion, a completely viable mechanism, but what will the venerable public say? Let's discuss.