Hello!
There has recently been a dispute about the rights to a computer program , which has been talked about a lot in public, and in which I and my colleagues took some part. As a result, a large number of questions arose about how such a thing could happen, how to behave so that it did not happen, and so on. Moreover, questions arose from both the conditional “programmer” employees and the “employers”. And this is despite the fact that Habré has quite a lot of good publications on this topic, for example, here .
I summarized all the questions and tried to answer them briefly - without quoting legislation and judicial practice and without complicated legal terms. I hope you will be interested.
If you really, really have not heard anything about intellectual property, office works and other legislative categories, I recommend to get acquainted with a small educational program. If you have at least a little topic - you can browse further.
The rights to certain results of intellectual activity are protected by a special legislative regime, as evidenced by Article 1225 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Such results are referred to as intellectual property. With respect to intellectual property, the exclusive right to use such a result is protected and, at its own discretion, to allow its use to others. In addition, the authors' personal non-property rights and other special rights are protected. The composition of such rights depends on the type of intellectual property and the applicable regime (copyright, patent law, and others).
It should be borne in mind that since intellectual property is intangible, the exercise of rights to it occurs regardless of the exercise of rights to a tangible medium in which a specific result of intellectual activity is expressed. That is, for example, the transfer of a book does not mean the transfer of an exclusive right to it, the transfer of a disk with a program does not mean an unequivocal right to use the program, etc.
Copyrighted works of science, literature and art. The peculiarity of copyright objects is that the rights to them arise directly from the moment of creation of the work, and no registration is necessary for their occurrence. Initially, rights arise directly from the author of the work - an individual who created them with his creative work. By virtue of the provisions of the law or by virtue of a contract concluded with the author, the exclusive right to a work may be transferred from the author to another person. The author, accordingly, will lose the exclusive right (although he will retain the inalienable right to be recognized as the author, the right to integrity and immutability of the work and other personal rights).
Computer programs by direct instruction of the law (Article 1262 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation) are protected by copyright. As a computer program is protected source and object code, generated as a result of its implementation of audiovisual display and preparatory materials obtained during the creation of the program.
If a computer program or other work is created by the author - an employee of the company, then the rights to such a work are transferred to the employer, if the creation of the work was part of the employee's work duties.
At the same time, work duties must be formulated in such a way that, among them, directly or indirectly, the obligation to create programs or other works when carrying out work follows. Separate instructions in the employment contract that “everything created by the employee belongs to the employer” is not enough.
Labor duties, as a rule, are fixed in the labor contract or job description, but in principle can be contained in any other document, if the requirements of the Labor Code for such a document are met (a written form, a mandatory delivery of a copy to the employee).
The work can also be created by order or during the execution of another contract. In this case, unless otherwise provided by the contract itself, in the first case, if the contract is concluded with an individual author, the right to work remains with the author, if with any other person - goes to the customer. In the case of the creation of a work as part of the execution of another contract, the right to work remains with the author (performer), again, unless otherwise provided by the contract.
Most likely you. Check that at the time of creating the program you did not have an employment contract and / or job description, which at least in some way imposes on you the obligation to create programs. And also check that you didn’t have any other contract that provides for the transfer of rights to the created program to the customer. In addition, the situation may change if you created a program before 2008 (then the laws were slightly different).
If you have a labor obligation (direct or indirect) to create programs in your employment contract, job description, or other document signed by you, then your employer. And it should be exactly the duty - that is, the condition that you do some work (involving the creation of programs) and get paid for it.
As for the indirect obligation, the subtlety here is that the courts often recognize the conditions of employment duties as providing for the creation of works, even if such conditions are formulated quite widely. For example, in this case , the employment contract between the author of the program and the employer provided for quite extensively formulated labor duties: “organizing the provision of information activities of the library and information databases”. Nevertheless, the court recognized that the specified work duties included the creation of computer programs.
If the work obligation is not provided, then the program most likely belongs to you (see the answer to question 1).
Most likely you. As I said, you need to remember:
Also keep in mind that employers do not like very much when their resources are used for personal purposes. They may be deprived of bonuses, reprimanded or dismissed (if there have been violations before).
Most likely, you, and, still, remember:
Again, employers, as a rule, are not very fond of when employees do something different during their working hours (although there are exceptions ).
Most likely, you, because not everything that the employer has written in the employment contract, is valid. We look at the answer to question 1.
Most likely, to you, a set of factors does not work here. We look at the answer to question 1 and especially note that the program was not created until 2008.
Most likely you. The transfer of a copy of the work does not entail the transfer of rights to it.
Most likely you. The source code is also a copy of the work.
No, this does not affect the transfer of rights to the program. But you can try to sue the employer for a fee.
If you are an individual, then you, unless otherwise expressly stated in the contract.
If you entered into a contract on behalf of your company, then to the customer, unless otherwise expressly stated in the contract.
You, if you have not written otherwise in the contract with the customer and the customer has not ordered the creation of this program separately.
If only in your company creation of programs is not the responsibility of the cleaning manager, the part that you have created is yours. The rest is for the employer.
Moreover, if the part you created is not independent, then you and your colleagues will be considered co-authors. And between you and the employer will be the joint possession of the exclusive right to the program.
Theoretically you, unless it was your responsibility to create computer games. But it will be extremely difficult to prove it.
In this situation, you may find it useful to prove that:
Most likely you, but there is a nuance.
In different countries, obviously, different legislation and other criteria may be established to recognize the work as work (including whether or not the employer instructed). In this case, as a rule, in the event of a dispute over the rights to works, the legislation of the country in which legal protection is sought is applied — that is, where they went to court.
Accordingly, the Russian court is likely to rule in your favor, but with foreign ones it is not clear how it will be.
Most likely you, but the situation is complicated. It should be borne in mind that disputes with the state often end in a different way than it should be according to the law.
In an ideal world, according to the law, if relations with you were not formalized, the employer does not have the right to the program, and, accordingly, he has nothing to transfer to the FSUE under the contract. As a result, if, nevertheless, the employer transfers the program to FSUE, and FSUE starts using it, then the employer and FSUE will be the violators, and both of them will be able to demand that they stop using and pay compensation. The employer, in addition, will still be responsible to the FSUE for the improper performance of the state contract.
However, in practice, and taking into account the provision established in Article 1298 of the Civil Code that the state should in any case be transferred either an exclusive right or a right of use (license), the chances that the court will satisfy the requirements to ban the use of the program and collect compensation in relation to FSUE, they are very small.
Most likely you. Using other people's resources cannot deprive you of the right to a work created by your creative work (there must be a creative contribution, and not just a technical selection of already existing solutions).
But an employer can make demands on you related to the use of such resources without the permission of the copyright holder.
Most likely you. Here is the same situation as in the previous question. Check only that you comply with the requirements of the GNU GPL license (or other license) so that the right holders do not make claims against you.
Did you have a trade secret regime and / or prisoners with NDA programmers? If not, it is almost impossible to hold the programmer accountable for disclosing information.
Regarding the competitor, there are a few more options. If he began to use the program - you can make him claims about the illegal use of this program (if you are the copyright holder). If among the transmitted information was information that meets the signs of production secrets, you can try to use this basis. You can also try to use the rules of antitrust laws.
A characteristic story is a dispute between the company INEC, its former employee and the company RISKFIN. The courts eventually refused to meet the requirements for the employee, but satisfied the claim to a competitor.
There is a case when the employer managed in such a situation to recover from the programmer the losses incurred, in the amount of the cost of developing a similar program. You can also try.
You can try to ban anything, nothing terrible will happen. But such a ban will not be valid, and the workers, realizing the freedom of labor guaranteed by the Constitution, can go to work wherever they want, whatever agreement they sign. And they will not be responsible for this.
It should also be borne in mind that in some countries (for example, the United States), concluding agreements on non-competition with employees is allowed - with certain restrictions and with the obligatory payment of additional compensation to employees.
Enter a trade secret regime (including accepting relevant local documents) and conclude with NDA employees and counterparties. This is the minimum of what can be done, then you need to look at the basis of a specific situation.
Two options:
You can relax a little, but you need to keep two things in mind.
Firstly, for the creation of works of service you need to pay a remuneration (separately from the salary) if you started using the work (or transfer the rights to it to another person, or notify the employee about keeping the work in secret). Failure to pay the remuneration will not deprive you of the rights to the programs created, but will be the basis for bringing an appropriate lawsuit against you (see the next question).
Secondly, if you do not start using the work for three years, do not transfer the right to it to another person and do not notify the employee about keeping the work in secret, the exclusive right to it will be returned to the employee.
Yes, the rights to the programs remain with you, if you have everything properly executed. You can relax until programmers come to you with a claim for recovery of remuneration for all the programs created. The amount of fair remuneration will be determined by the court.
Registration of programs in Rospatent does not give rise to any rights and is not an absolute confirmation of their presence. Until it is proven otherwise, you will be considered the copyright holder, but if a dispute arises, and it reaches the court, then the information in the registry can be challenged.
A few recommendations:
To perform the above steps, I recommend to involve a lawyer, since each situation is unique and must be assessed separately.
Take your lawyer and do with him a small audit of intellectual property in the company. The audit should be done according to the following plan:
For your own comfort, such a small audit will suffice.
In principle, in almost all questions you can replace the program with any other copyright object and the meaning does not change. And, for example, in patent law, a slightly different story, there service objects are recognized as objects, the creation of which was part of employment duties, and objects created for a specific task of the employer.
If, after reading these questions, your curiosity has not been exhausted, and even more so if there are new questions, I will be glad to answer them in the comments. The most interesting questions will complement the post (so in the title - 30+).
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/458406/
All Articles