
The first press releases about the emergence of coherent CFP modules (coherent CFP optical pluggable modules) began to appear about 5-6 years ago. Then their use in optical sealing systems was new and was essentially a niche solution. Now, after six years, these modules have firmly entered the world of telecom and continue to gain popularity. What they are, how they differ and what solutions based on their offer (and of course the pictures under the spoilers) - all this is under the cut. To read the article you will need an understanding of the basic principles of DWDM systems.
A brief excursion into the past
Historically, for optical pluggable modules with a transfer rate of 100G, the CFP form factor was the first, and it also became the first form factor for CFP-WDM solutions. At that time there were two solutions on the market:
1. CFP from
Menara (now part of the IPG photonics) allows you to send 4 separate 28Gbps channels to the line in a standard DWDM 50GHz frequency grid using pulse modulation. Not widely spread, although in principle it had an interesting potential for building metro networks. Further in the article we do not consider such modules.
')

2. CFP from the pioneers - Acacia
press release , built on the most advanced at the time of coherent detection technology using DP-QPSK modulation.

What was the breakthrough of Acacia modules:- it was the first module in the industry to offer a separate 50GHz coherent channel 100Gbit DP-QPSK
- fully tunable (tunable) to C-band
Prior to this, such solutions always looked something like this: a linear laser was a non-removable element of the board, on which there was only one connector for a client optical module. It looked like this:

Let me remind you that at that time it was 2013.
Such a module replaced the classic linear DWDM interface on a classic transponder operating in C-band, which can be amplified, multiplexed, etc.
Now the principles of building coherent networks have become the de facto building standard in the industry and this will not surprise anyone, and the density and range of optical sealing systems has grown many times.
Module components
Their first (Acacia) module was a CFP-ACO type. Below is a brief reference to the actual differences between coherent CFP modules. But for this, you first need to make a small offtopic and tell a little about what DSP is, which is in many ways the heart of this technology.
a little about the module and DSPA module generally consists of several components.

- Narrowband tunable laser
- Dual polarized coherent modulator
- Digital to analog onverter (DAC / ADC) - DAC that turns a digital signal into an optical signal and vice versa.
- Digital signal processor (DSP) - restores useful information from the signal, removing from it the effects exerted on the useful signal in the transmission process. In particular:
- Chromatic Dispersion Compensation (CMD). Moreover, his stock of mathematical compensation is practically unlimited. And this is great, since the physical compensation of CMD has always caused quite a lot of problems, since it caused an increase in non-linear effects in the fiber. You can read more about non-linear effects on the Internet or in a booklet.
- Polarization mode dispersion compensation (PMD). Compensation also takes place mathematically, but due to the complexity of the nature of PMD, this is a more complex process and it is PMD that is now one of the main reasons for limiting the range of optical systems (by attenuation and non-linear effects).
DSP Works at very high symbolic speeds, in the newest systems this is about 69 Gbaud.
So how are they different?
Coherent optical modules distinguish each other from the DSP layout:
- FP-ACO - Only the optical part is located on the module. All electronics are located on the board (card; board) of the equipment where this module is inserted. At that time, there simply wasn’t any technology to accommodate the DSP inside the optical module. In fact, these are first generation modules.
- CFP-DCO - in this case, the DSP is located in the optical module itself. The module is a complete "boxed solution". These are second generation modules.
Externally, the modules have a completely identical form factor. But they have different fillings, consumption (DCO is approximately twice as large) and heat generation. Accordingly, decision makers have a certain flexibility - ACO provides deeper integration of solutions, DCO allows you to get a solution out of the box, using such an optical module as a cube Lego to build your solution. A separate moment - in the overwhelming majority of cases, the work of a pair of DSPs is possible exclusively for the same manufacturer. This imposes certain limitations and
potentially makes DCO modules much more attractive for interopability tasks .
Evolution of the solution
Since progress does not stand still and
MSA is constantly developing new standards, the last form factor in which we managed to locate DSP is CFP2.
In fact, they are, I believe, close to the next step. Here is a CFP4-ACOby chance, I stumbled upon this
miracle : But I don’t yet know the commercial products on such modules.

Form Factor (CFP2) now dominates all finished commercial products. These are the connectors you probably saw on telecom equipment and many are confused that these connectors are much more common to most QSFP28. Now you know one of the ways to use them (but it is better to additionally make sure that the equipment can work with CFP2-ACO / DCO).
comparison of QSFP28 and CFP2 connectors using Juniper AXC6160 as an example In addition to compact size, modulation methods are also being improved. In all CFP2-ACO / DCO products known to me, not only DP-QPSK modulation is supported, but also QAM-8 / QAM-16. That is why these modules are called 100G / 200G. The customer can choose the modulation that suits him based on the tasks. In the near future, modules supporting speeds of up to 400G per optical channel should appear.
Acacia Solution Evolution However, in the overwhelming majority of cases for Ultra long haul (ULH) solutions classic non-modular linear interfaces are used, which allow for longer range, better OSNR and higher modulation levels. Therefore, the main area of application for coherent modules is mainly merto / regional networks. If you look
here , you can see that they probably
DSP manufacturers
The global coherent DSP manufacturers who sell them to third-party companies are:
CFP2-ACO / DCO Manufacturers
Manufacturers of ACO / DCO coherent modules:
Given that some of these companies are in a state of
appraisal and proposed mergers and acquisitions, the market for suppliers of such solutions, it seems to me, will narrow. The production of such modules is a complicated technological production, so for now, I think it will not be possible to buy them from the suppliers of the Middle Kingdom for a long time.
Impact on the industry
The emergence of such modules has led to a small transformation of the ecosystem of proposed solutions on the market.
Manufacturers began to use them in classical (transponder) DWDM solutions, as ordinary linear interfaces. Having received a bonus of modularity, flexibility and cost reduction (by the way, such solutions are often chosen as Alien Wavelength).
For example:
manufacturers already supplying telecom equipment - switches and routers, expanded the range and added support for such modules, further
bringing us closer to the so-called IPoDWDM systems . For example:
- Juniper (MX / QFX / ACX)
- Cisco (NCS / ASR)
- Nokia (SR)
- Arista (7500R)
- Edge-Core (Cassini AS7716-24SC)
All of the listed manufacturers already have boards for routers or switches that support coherent CFP2 modules.
It is worth mentioning interesting trends in the global community, for example, the
TIP project is one of the focuses of which is the development of
open optical networks . The construction of such networks will allow integrating equipment into open-source control systems, making the interaction between optical system manufacturers more transparent and open. In addition, on the devices themselves (both on transponders using DCO modules and on ROADM / EDFA), it is planned to use software from various vendors (for example,
Ipinfusion ). Therefore, the trend of recent years is the unification of the component base of solutions and the uniqueness of software development, in which a sufficiently large bet is made on the opensource.
Thank you for your attention, I hope this article turned out to be interesting and useful for you. Additional questions you can ask in the comments or in person. If you have something to add on this topic, I will be very happy.
the main picture for the article is takenFrom the site
www.colt.net , I hope they do not mind.