The future (or secret present) of plasma engines or how to achieve 27 max moves in the atmosphere
“They say that those who saw a hypersonic ekranoplan flying in a plasma bubble, from which the tank left, sfotal, and then drove back, nobody will tell anything about it.”
In winter, I pestered Green Cat for a long time about plasma engines and their physical limitations. And so he published the post , and after all I want to understand a little bit about “pseudoscience” and myths, and also to understand whether in the near future there is a substitute for chemical rocket engines for my jetpack.
I am not an expert in engines. Well, absolutely never a specialist, but I want to figure it out. I will make a small “stuffing” with the expectation that habraintelect will bring out a plasma to clean water .
')
How does an engine sound in the atmosphere, the outflow rate of which is higher than the fourth cosmic one?
Is it possible that even now there are working samples of plasma engines on military equipment that can provide a flight speed of 27 sweeps for an object of 100-1000 kg?
What are the primary sources with different levels of confidence on this issue?
The prototype, being scaled to the size of a conventional aircraft engine, is said to be able to develop thrust from 50 to 150 kilonewtons, depending on the applied voltage. The tested prototype is an installation with a length of 80 millimeters and a diameter of 14 millimeters.
Researchers believe that in the future such magnetic-plasma-dynamic engines can be installed on airplanes, and the power units will work effectively at all stages: from take-off to flight at an altitude of 50 thousand meters.
The principle of operation of a magneto-plasma compressor for an analogue of a Laval nozzle.
Thrust and impulse for different types of batteries at different pressures.