Last week, my team held an exciting event at the Four Seasons Hotel in Houston, Texas. It was devoted to the continuation of the tendency of development of closer relations between the participants. It was an event that brought together users, partners and customers. . In addition, many Hitachi representatives attended the event. When organizing this enterprise, we set ourselves two goals:
Doug Gibson and Matt Hall ( Agile Geoscience ) began by discussing the state of the industry and the various problems associated with managing and processing seismic data. It was quite inspiring and, of course, revealing to hear how the volume of investment is distributed between production, transportation and processing. Most recently, the lion's share of investment was in mining, which was once the king of the volume of funds consumed, but gradually investments are being transferred into processing and transportation. Matt spoke about his fascination with literal observation of the geological development of the Earth using seismic data.
In general, I believe that our event can be considered as the “first appearance” for works that we started several years ago. We will continue to inform you about the various achievements and successes in our work, which is being pursued in this direction. Further, inspired by Matt Hall’s performance, we conducted a series of sessions, which resulted in a very valuable exchange of experiences.
At one of the sessions, Doug and Ravi (Hitachi Research in Santa Clara) held a discussion on how to transfer some of the analytics to peripheral computing for faster and more accurate decision making. There are many reasons for this, and I think that the three most significant of them are narrow data transmission channels, large amounts of data (both in terms of arrival rate, volume and diversity), and tight decision-making schedules. Despite the fact that some processes (especially geological) may take weeks, months or years to complete, there are quite a few cases in this industry where urgency is of particular importance. In this case, the inability to access the centralized cloud can be disastrous! In particular, issues related to HSE (health, safety and the environment), as well as issues related to oil and gas production, require rapid analysis and decision-making. Perhaps the best way is to show this with different numbers as an example - let the specific details remain anonymous to “protect the innocent”.
It certainly makes me think that while the providers of public cloud systems are trying to transfer all this data to their platforms, there is a harsh reality that you need to try to cope with. Perhaps the best way to classify this problem is to try to shove an elephant through a straw! However, many of the virtues of the cloud are simply necessary. So what can we do?
Of course, Hitachi already has (industry) optimized solutions on the market that enrich data at the border, analyze it and compress it to the minimum useful amount of data, and also provide business advisory systems that can improve peripheral computing processes. However, my conclusion from last week is that the solutions to these complex problems are related not so much to the widget that you bring to the table, as to the approach to solving the problem. This is really the spirit of the Lumada platform from the Hitachi Insight Group, as it includes methods for attracting users, ecosystems and, if necessary, provides tools for discussion. I was very happy to return to solving problems (and not selling products), because Matt Hall said: “I was glad to see that Hitachi employees started to understand the extent of the problem” when we closed our summit.
So can the O & G (oil and gas industry) make a living example of the need to implement peripheral computing? It seems that, given the problems found during our summit, as well as other industry interactions, the likely answer is yes. Perhaps the reason for this is so clear, because peripheral computing, industry targeting, and blending of cloud design patterns are evident as the stacks upgrade. I think that in this case the question “how” deserves attention.
Using Matt's quote from the last paragraph, we understand how to push the principle of cloud computing to peripheral computing. In fact, for this industry, we have to carry out “old-fashioned” and sometimes personal contacts with people who participate in different parts of the ecosystem of the oil and gas industry, such as geologists, drilling engineers, geophysicists, and so on. Given these interactions that need to be addressed, their scope and depth become more obvious and even convincing. Then, when we draw up implementation plans and bring them to life, we will decide to build peripheral cloud systems.
')
However, if we are sitting in the center, just reading and presenting these problems, we will not have enough understanding and sympathy to really do our best. So again, yes, oil and gas will create peripheral cloud systems, but it is an understanding of the real needs of local users that will help us determine which problems are of primary importance.
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/446388/
All Articles