I often travel to conferences of various sizes, sometimes as a listener, sometimes as a speaker, and I often notice that even at huge conferences, even among significant people in the industry, even quite famous speakers, there are things that spoil the impression of a speech a hall, or at all, forces a person to leave the hall by not listening to the speaker to the end. Today I would like to consider those things that, in my opinion, spoil the emotions of your listeners and make them not listen to you.
It so happened that the Russian language is not particularly often used by modern domestic engineers. At work, you name variables in English, documentation in English, and even the content of your application, often in English. Years prof. deformations force you to use a foreign language everywhere, including your presentation - which is bad for the audience. A visual memory is much more powerful than an auditory memory, and if you are dissynchronized, with what a person sees and what you say - the audience understands less. Use the presentation language in the presentation, keeping the balance of what you say and what you show.
Humor is a very important showman tool. You can dilute the report with humor and give the audience a break from the flow of basic information, but when humor is not a means, but a goal, the report rolls into a stand-up, or TOP 10 best memes from 2ch. It is necessary to give the audience a rest from the report, and not make it laugh to suffer. Lack of humor does not always badly affect your listeners, as the report itself can be easy to read, while the flow of funny pictures is always. Try to introduce one rule: if your report really requires “cognitive breaks”, then try to insert no more than one joke / funny picture for 5-15 minutes of the report (depending on the format).
A more important part of the report is its visualization. Visual content remains in the memory of the viewer and creates long-term memories and associations. But, as soon as you start “playing with fonts”, “choose an unusual background” or use dizzying animations, no matter how interesting your speech is - the viewer's associations break down and his eyes start to hurt.
Checklist is simple:
A mediocre speaker like a fading rock star - just repeats old material. And before you add an angry comment, I’ll say that you naturally need to improve your report and the next time you can make it richer and more interesting than the previous one, the difference is only in the number of iterations. There is no consensus on the number of speeches with one theme, but I adhere to the idea that there is no need to repeat the report more than once (if you are not speaking in another language, for example).
The main purpose of any report: to bring something to the viewer, and when most of the audience does not understand you (or does not want to understand), your report fails. Each topic has its own audience, and it would be foolish to tell on a CSS mitap how to work with memory in C, or how to open your bakery business in a JavaScript conference. Know the “average of the hospital” baggage of knowledge of your students and topics that they will be interested in, and most importantly, understandable .
One of the guarantees of a good performance is its preparation. If the speaker scores on preparation - the report becomes terrible. By preparing the report, I understand the following things:
More important than the visualization of the report is its presentation. Submission of the report includes many criteria: voice, facial expressions, gestures, postures, focus on key phrases and much more. But if you miss the key points - the report will become incomprehensible, no matter how cool the content may be.
If you have problems with public speaking, then sign up for courses, read Cicero, prepare phrases or whole sentences for a report. Otherwise, at best, no one will understand you.
Everybody puts a goal into the report: someone wants to make a contribution to the community, someone to tell people about their profits / suffering with some kind of technology, and someone just for HYIP. I am not a snob, and I understand that every report is to some extent a PR move by the speaker himself (or his company). But there are speakers who have one goal - PR. Such reports are usually about not very complicated and popular (already chewed at hundreds of conferences) things. They do not carry any meaning, and are filled with a bunch of links to the author, the logos of his company, a story about the steepness of the company / speaker’s decisions, and so on.
One of the most terrible things for a speaker is not owning the topic of a report. There are two kinds of speakers with this problem:
I thought for a long time about what repels me most of all from the report - the first and only option arising in my thoughts was arrogance. A good speaker should always put himself on a par with the community. A good speaker offers a solution, and does not impose the only true thoughts, to which no one but the author will guess (sarcasm). A good speaker talks about his experience, and do not criticize the experience of others. A good speaker listens to questions and corrects his knowledge, and does not publicly defend his point of view.
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/430834/
All Articles