Alexander Gusyatiner, Oleg Zhikharev
Sea-Freight Automation Foundation (SAF)
Version 0.2, October 04, 2018
The current model of information support of transport processes can be characterized as follows:
Most business processes, including those processes that are repeated regularly and do not require making complex decisions, are fully controlled and executed by people. During the execution of various logistics contracts, staff routinely make phone calls, use e-mail, re-enter data into various web forms, track shipments in various online platforms, document the implementation of contracts, and so on.
Most of the management systems used are large, difficult to change monoliths, which limit and make it difficult to adapt to new technologies and business changes.
These systems include:
Information Platforms : shippers' platforms, customs platforms (Customs Single Window), container line platforms, railway platforms, sea terminal management systems (TOS), road carriers platforms, port management systems, etc.
Integration Platforms providing interaction between management systems and individual clients operating on the Internet: Commercial cloud integration platforms, Port Community Systems, Electronic Payment Systems, etc.
Business processes are divided into separate, unrelated, fragments. For example, the container export process occurs in the following fragments:
* . * . * .
As a result, it is not possible to trace the entire transport process and participants are often required to re-enter data.
During a normal work day, a user who performs a repetitive standard task has to use online platforms, where this task is performed in completely different ways. For example, for container lines, each Terminal Management System has its own user interface for booking containers on a ship.
As a result, different participants interact in different ways with each other, their roles are not clearly defined, business transactions (transactions) are performed and documented in different ways.
No Standard API.
Information and commercial integration platforms of the same purpose have different integration capabilities: they support non-standard APIs and use different message formats, such as: EDI, XML, comma-separated values files, Excel, etc.
Using various Internet protocols. \
The situation is complicated by the use of various protocols for data exchange on the Internet: FTP, Email, WEB Services, etc. \
Lack of Internet services for a number of participants.
Most of the container lines and freight forwarders have their own websites with various 24/7 services, but most of the shippers, road carriers, customs brokers do not have a permanent presence on the Internet. As a result, telephone calls, Internet mail and meetings are the main ways to communicate and this communication often stops when participants are unavailable.
All of the above factors lead to the following consequences:
Basic definitions and characteristics of SAF:
The use of SAF can lead to the following positive changes:
Condition Today | SAF |
Manual control of shipping processes and manual data entry. | Computer control of the transportation process, applicable to all participants in the transportation. Less dependent on the availability and efficiency of the process participants. No re-entry of data. |
Large monolithic platforms. | Small services (applications) with clearly defined functions. ') Where necessary, these services will be integrated with existing platforms. |
Fragmentary Unrelated Processes. | Full integration of all processes. |
Different user interfaces for different online services. | Unified user interfaces. |
No standard for business Roles, Agreements and Transactions. | Define standard business Roles, Agreements and Transactions written in Proto 3 data description language. |
No standard for API . | Standard APIs that include a description of the methods and message formats written in Proto 3. |
Using a variety of Internet protocols. | gRPC is a modern multi-platform framework from Google for remote procedure calls. |
Lack of Internet services for a number of participants. | The presence on-line of all participants in the transportation process. |
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/426265/
All Articles