As we can see, in nature, there are enough examples of recovery after freezing. Therefore, it is quite reasonable to try to unravel the biological mechanisms that ensure this success and apply them to humans.
To begin with, let's take a very short look at the main problems of the cooling of living organisms. The main problem is of course the formation of ice crystals, which can damage the cells, because the crystals are (a) prickly and (b) take up more space than the source water. But it is not so scary, as it is exposed to illiterate opponents of cryonics, which frighten us with exploding cells when cooling and other antiscientific things.
First, when cooled, water from the cell goes into the extracellular space, so when cooled, the cells, on the contrary, decrease, rather than explode. And secondly, ice is only 9% lighter than the original water , and the cells have a much greater supply of elasticity, thanks to which they can safely tolerate both an increase or decrease in their volume and the presence of a certain amount of ice in the intercellular space. And thirdly, cryobiologists have long learned how to process both cells, tissues, and whole organs with cryoprotectants - substances that minimize the formation of ice crystals when frozen. Coupled with the optimal regimes of lowering the temperature, this has allowed scientists for many decades to freeze (or to vitrify , to be exact) and to thaw out both embryos and whole organs.
Here is a table of those organs that as far back as 1980, scientists already knew how to freeze to -79 ° C and defrost ( source ):
Among other problems of cooling, denaturation (deployment) of proteins can be noted, but, fortunately, with a decrease in temperature, this denaturation is most often reversible. Unlike raising - the boiled egg cannot be boiled back. At the same time, since all chemical reactions (and therefore biological processes) slow down at low temperatures, and then stop altogether, the harm from such denaturation is minimal for frozen organisms.
Well, at the end of the list of problems it is worth mentioning thermal macrocracks, especially often formed when the temperature drops below -140 ° C. As far as they are fraught with complications, the question is still open, but there are opinions that their danger is low. Also, there are new technologies on the horizon of how these cracks could have been avoided - for example, by not allowing the cryopatient's body temperature to fall below -140 ° C:
Let's move from theory to practice and look at the experimental data - when scientists tried to freeze those who do not like to do it themselves. People, for example. But first, take a look at the animals.
Various insects successfully froze and thawed 100 years ago, this will surprise no one. Therefore, I will mention just a few examples.
Many have heard about the indestructibility of Tardighoda ( Tardigrada ) - they were sent into space and were frozen to -196 ° C without any preparation or cryoprotectants. And nothing, they were defrosted and lived on.
Nematode worms are a favorite model organism of biologists. They were honed vitrification technology, giving 100% survival. Moreover, it was also shown that their long-term memory is preserved after several days of freezing at -80 ° C! What is very important to demonstrate the preservation of the individual after freezing
In other experiments, the Alaskan beetle ( Upis ceramboides ) was successfully thawed after cooling to -75 ° C - and this is a much larger insect:
One of the first important experiments on the freezing of mammals was carried out as far back as 1951 (and the very first were still in 1912 — when Porfiry Bakhmetiev introduced into anabiosis bats - this is the original of his 1912 (!) Article of the year). In these studies, rats were frozen without any cryoprotectants, and it was found that by lowering the temperature to 0 ° C (but not lower), almost 100% survival can be achieved. Moreover, some rats were frozen and thawed repeatedly - some as much as 10 times. The researchers also found that with fast freezing ( supercooling ), when the water does not have time to turn into ice, some rats can survive even after cooling down to -3 ° C:
In the same 1950s, other researchers froze hamsters, bringing their temperature to -1 ° C, and varied the freezing times to determine how much ice their bodies could tolerate. In these experiments, it was shown that as much as 60% of the water in the brain can turn into ice without visible behavioral consequences for animals after defrosting. ( Source , Source ).
By the way, in the studies of 1954–6, some hamsters survived even after cooling below -3 ° C. Some of them were cooled to body temperature between -3 ° C and -5.5 ° C, at which they were held for 16 to 38 minutes, and then quickly heated and restored, after which these hamsters lived for many more months without any problems with health:
Experiments with primates ( Galago crassicaudatus ) in the same 1950s were less successful. After freezing below 0 ° C (without cryoprotectants!), Primates first recovered, but then did not live for more than a day, dying either from pulmonary edema or intraperitoneal hemorrhage (caused by gastric juice, diffused from the bile glands or the stomach, and eaten away by abdominal fabrics). But the cooling schedules are quite impressive:
Twenty-first century, too, have something to brag about. For a long time, the kidney remained the most difficult organ for cryopreservation - after defrosting, its function, alas, was critically violated. But in the early 2000s, the star of cryobiology, Gregory Fey, was able to take this line. By the way, it is rather symbolic that these works were made under the auspices of 21st Century Medicine.
In his experiments, Fahey removed one kidney from a rabbit, vitrified it to various temperatures, then thawed it and transplanted it back to the donor, after which it removed the second, healthy kidney. In 2003, Fahey was able to find a successful combination of cryoprotectants and a rather complex vitrification protocol that allowed him to successfully cool his kidneys to -22 ° C or even -45 ° C , and for two rabbits he was able to cool to as much as -130 ° C. However, more than 30 rabbits were successfully cooled to -22 ° C or -45 ° C, and of the two whose kidneys were cooled to -130 ° C, one died 9 days after the return transplant, and the second lived 48 days after which was scored for histological analysis.
By the way, this famous photo, vividly demonstrating the difference between a frozen and vitrified kidney, originates from an even earlier work by Feija - 1984 (!) Of the year:
Compared with the kidney, the brain is considered by cryobiologists to be far more adapted to cryopreservation. In whole or in part, it was possible to freeze it or vitify it without structural damage repeatedly. Moreover, in several works, the preservation of its various functions was demonstrated.
The most intriguing were and remain the experiments of the Japanese cryobiologist Isamu Suda. In 1966, the Court issued an article where he stated that he was able to detect electrical activity in cat brains after months of freezing at -20 ° C. Here is a squeeze of EEG from his work:
This is how the perfusion device looked like:
In 1974, the Court published its next , much more detailed work. In it, he, in particular, showed that even after 7 years of freezing at -20 ° C, the cat's brain showed synchronized electrical activity for several hours after defrosting, although of a worse quality than that of the brain, which had not been frozen. He also compared the EEG of a “fresh” brain and brain after 5 days of storage at –20 ° C; their performance was almost identical.
Here it is necessary to mention that so far no one has managed to reproduce the results of the Courts, although no one has tried to repeat in detail, step by step, all his methodology. Before retirement, the Court handed over all of its materials and laboratory journals to Gregory Fey, and he did not see any signs of falsification in them.
At the same time, Fahey also conducted various experiments on the selection of the optimal protocol for brain cryopreservation. And in 2016, he, together with colleagues from 21st Century Medicine, received the Small Mammal Brain Preservation Prize for the technology of preserving the histological structure of the rabbit brain. True, this brain was irreversibly processed (or fixed ) by aldehyde, which makes its biological functioning impossible after defrosting, but this does not negate the importance of this achievement for cryobiology.
Long before that, back in 2006, Fahey, together with Yury Pichugin, demonstrated that with proper selection of a cryoprotectant and vitrification protocol, rat brain sections are perfectly preserved even after -130 ° C: more than 90% of the samples retained their structure and even the potential for electrical activity (measured by the proportion of sodium and potassium ions compared with the control).
And in 2007, 21st Century Medicine announced that it was able to confirm the preservation of basic electrical “learning abilities” (long-term potentiation, long-term potentiation , LTP) of neurons in rabbit brain sections after vitrification, and then published these results in 2012 The book "Cryopreservation of Precision Cut Tissue Slices":
Figure 6B. This is a form of neurophysiological “memory” response. excitatory post-synaptic field potentials at the Schaffer Collision-CA1 dendrite junction) Control response to about 30% above the baseline response amplitude (LTP ratio of 1.3) in response to prior “training”. After loading and unloading of VM3 (LU); after loading of VM3, vitrification, rewarming, and unloading of VM3 (VIT); and the storage of water temperature (STR); each values represent the number of independent bars. Previously unpublished data of 21st Century Medicine.
Here are a couple of patients:
Returning to the experiments of the Courts - in 2016, Canadian scientists published even more amazing (if not to say implausible) results. They were able to detect electrical activity in human brains that have been stored for more than 20 years in formalin:
Formalin is a well-known tissue fixer, widely used in biology for storing various samples, since it irreversibly fixes the state of tissues at the cellular level. Roughly speaking, it “sticks together” the cells, turning them into jelly. Nobody could expect that the tissues so treated could retain at least some biological function. If only because the formalin-treated cell membranes are destroyed and stop pumping protons, and this is theoretically necessary for the transmission of electrical impulses. Therefore, the results of Canadians, almost all are treated with great skepticism. But at the same time, there is no reason to consider these data as falsifications, so it would be very useful if someone from respected cryobiologists, especially those with experience in brain tissue, tried to reproduce them.
Why are experiments that demonstrate the ability of the brain to restore its functions after a short or long break in its work (even without freezing), so important? Because they show that cryonics can work: after all, almost all neuroscientists agree that long-term memory, and therefore our personality, is encoded in the physical structures of the brain, and not in its electrical activity. Moreover, the brain's electrical activity ceases below + 18 ° C, but this does not bear any negative consequences after the restoration of homeostasis. We see this also in people who have undergone profound hypothermia or brain surgery ( source 1 , source 2 ), and on experimental animals, from nematodes and hamsters to primates.
Moreover, the technology of stopping brain activity with subsequent recovery has been repeatedly validated in dozens of animal experiments, and even already undergoing clinical trials on people in the US - I mean the EPR CAT study on hibernation and cooling patients with gunshot wounds to 10 ° C. Here is a description of the study in PubMed:
But an article about him in New Yorker:
Here is another resuscitating physician who uses cooling to recover from a heart attack. By the way, he believes that in the future we will be able to recover patients 12 or even 24 hours after the onset of “clinical death”:
Prior to use in humans, the cooling-free anabiosis technology was tested on our very close relatives - pigs. They pumped out all the blood, replacing it with saline, and lowering their body temperature to 10 ° C. In total, more than 200 pigs underwent this procedure with a successful recovery:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18404056
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16456447
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4166101/
Before pigs, a very similar technology was tested on dogs:
And the star of cryonics, Mike Darwin, was even able to bring the interval of bloodless suspended animation to 5 hours . That is, the dog was completely without blood for 5 hours, and then completely restored, including long-term memory - recognizing familiar people and responding to commands. And it was not an isolated experiment. Together with Jerry Lif, Mike conducted a series of such experiments on “complete bleeding”:
Also in the 80s, a case was described with a cat that recovered after an hour without a heartbeat, and this is without any cooling.
All these data allow us to believe that even with a delay of several hours between the onset of clinical death and the onset of cryopatient perfusion, the latter has chances for future recovery of brain functions. Firstly, because even without cooling, irreversible changes in the brain begin to occur only after 1–2 hours, and necrosis of neurons begins only after 4–6. And secondly, because the brain is a very plastic organ that can recover from serious damage.
I will give a few examples of such recovery.
For example, US Senator Gabriel Giffords , who was shot through the brain in 2011, and six months later she returned to work in the Senate. On the left photo she is in the hospital, and on the right she jumps with a parachute after several years.
Or here is another case of successful recovery from a shot-through brain - Rachel Barezinski . The bullet went through the whole brain, but Rachel survived and recovered:
Moreover, some people even remove the whole hemisphere:
And some even more:
, . , .. .. , 1930-. , :
— , :
, . — . , 10 000 “”, , , . :
— , 4 8 . . , , , , , , . : , , 70 :
, - — , 0°C. , - - , .
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/404019/
All Articles