The lord is charged with 40 episodes of criminal activity (felony), 38 of them are related to hacking. In US law, episodes are grouped, after which each group is either summarized or absorbed the most. The largest group is presented as punishment. In addition, there are crimes that are not grouped and are certainly summed up by the final date.
In the judgment, the episodes are grouped as follows (I will try to translate in a manner that roughly corresponds to our legal terminology:
- 1-10 - Wire Fraud Fraud - 336 months
- 12-19 - Intentionally causing damage to electronic computing devices that perform important operational functions (Intentional Damage to a Protected Computer) in conjunction with
- 21-29 - Obtaining Information from a Protected Computer - 60 months
- 30-38 - Illegal access to devices (Access Device Fraud) - 120 months
As a result, we take the maximum term - 336 months. They are added 24 months for points 39 and 40 (giving knowingly false testimony). We get 360 months, or 30 years.
Paragraphs 11 and 20, apparently, relate to the organization of criminal activity, and the jury decided that they were not proven.
Now about some interesting things.
In addition to this system, the United States has developed a special assessment table, which allows formalizing the aggravating parameters, and increasing the term in proportion to the severity. For Seleznev, the table takes into account, for example, the following items:
- Loss in excess of $ 550 million - total financial losses exceed 550 million
10 or more victims - more than 10 victims - Scheme committed from outside the US - offense committed from outside the US
- Organizer / leader - the defendant is the leader of a criminal organization
- Obstruction of justice - the defendant impeded the administration of justice
According to this table, the prosecution should have recommended a life sentence, but the use of such “modifiers” is permissible only in certain cases, for example, if the case falls under the RICO Act. And to prove RICO is quite expensive, and not at all a fact. that the organization of Seleznyov fits it. Therefore, “modifiers” were not used.
All the more surprising is the fact that these calculations are in prison because, according to American laws, they are irrelevant to the case and should have been removed and excluded from the testimony for the jury. In my personal opinion, this is evidence of unskilled legal assistance provided to a citizen of the Russian Federation, for such calculations clearly set up a jury against the defendant.
In the verdict you can see the strangeness, in the description of the groups of episodes, it says:
for each of the counts 1-10 (Wire Fraud), can be billed 39 and 40
That is, the punishment for episodes should be served together with other episodes, and together with other groups of episodes. If you think about it, this means that for 1 episode Wire Froud give 28 (!) Years. This incident is a historical feature of the United States. Fraud with the use of federal communications (mail, communications operators) and financial (banks) institutions is a particularly serious crime in the United States.
The proposed prosecution scheme is interesting, according to which the accusation against Seleznev was prepared in several states at once, and the episodes were distributed among all. At least two states were preparing to file charges on the aforementioned RICO Act, demanding life imprisonment. The interesting thing is this: in any legal country no one can be convicted of the same crime twice, but in the USA a person can be convicted of the same crime several times in different states, if the charges do not coincide completely in the episodes. That is, it is worth replacing one episode with one for which the accusation was not advanced - and the new process in another state is ready. In the case of Seleznyov, there are a lot of episodes.