Rutracker returns: first official "mirror" launched
Moreover, the "mirror" in the literal and figurative sense
Today, the administration of the torrent tracker Rutracker announced the launch of the first official "mirror" of the main site. It is located on the domain rutracker.net. And in this case “mirror” is not only a technical term. The fact is that the design of the new site is similar to the original, with one reservation. This is a mirror image of the original.
')
Users have already asked the administration about the reasons for such a decision, and received an answer: “it's the same mirror!”.
Izvestia published a response from the administration of the resource, which stated that the site will now “work on a permanent basis. Made it [mirror - approx. Ed.] in order to look at the language on which the Moscow City Court will block the resource. Regular users can use it. ”
Roskomnadzor previously offered to ban "mirrors" of sites without a court decision, as well as to fine for tips on circumventing the lock.
Thus, a group of rightholders, together with Roskomnadzor, prepared a new bill, in which new rules are being written regarding the blocking of sites and their “mirrors”. In particular, it is proposed to ban mirrors of sites (in respect of which a decision was made on the "eternal" blocking) without a court decision. In addition, penalties are introduced for “promoting the means of circumventing the blocking of pirated resources”. Thus, the department facilitates the work of the right holders - now you do not need to sue in relation to any of the mirrors of the already blocked site, copies of resources will be banned automatically.
At the moment, the concept of a “mirror” or a copy of the site itself is not enshrined in law, respectively, and there is no judicial procedure for blocking clones of blocked sites. The Moscow City Court in February of this year refused to make a decision on permanently blocking Rutracker mirrors precisely on the basis of the absence of a legislative base. If the bill proposed by Roskomnadzor and the right holders is adopted, then there will not be such a problem - they will block copies of the sites already in semi-automatic mode.
Rights holders propose to oblige to fight with copies of blocked resources and search services. If they disagree or do poor work on blocking links to pirated content, search engines will be fined . Providers who in time did not restrict access to a blocked resource will also be punished.
Today, the administration of the torrent tracker Rutracker announced the launch of the first official "mirror" of the main site. It is located on the domain rutracker.net. And in this case “mirror” is not only a technical term. The fact is that the design of the new site is similar to the original, with one reservation. This is a mirror image of the original.
')
Users have already asked the administration about the reasons for such a decision, and received an answer: “it's the same mirror!”.
@_rutracker_org reversed image. pic.twitter.com/tzGqlCVTYs
- Sergey Nikitin (@ Continuing39) April 3, 2016
@ Continuing39 is a mirror!
- Rutracker Org (@_rutracker_org) on April 4, 2016
Izvestia published a response from the administration of the resource, which stated that the site will now “work on a permanent basis. Made it [mirror - approx. Ed.] in order to look at the language on which the Moscow City Court will block the resource. Regular users can use it. ”
We had a mirror - https://t.co/9stj0CZGWN . Quickly block, do you think?
- Rutracker Org (@_rutracker_org) April 1, 2016
Roskomnadzor previously offered to ban "mirrors" of sites without a court decision, as well as to fine for tips on circumventing the lock.
Thus, a group of rightholders, together with Roskomnadzor, prepared a new bill, in which new rules are being written regarding the blocking of sites and their “mirrors”. In particular, it is proposed to ban mirrors of sites (in respect of which a decision was made on the "eternal" blocking) without a court decision. In addition, penalties are introduced for “promoting the means of circumventing the blocking of pirated resources”. Thus, the department facilitates the work of the right holders - now you do not need to sue in relation to any of the mirrors of the already blocked site, copies of resources will be banned automatically.
At the moment, the concept of a “mirror” or a copy of the site itself is not enshrined in law, respectively, and there is no judicial procedure for blocking clones of blocked sites. The Moscow City Court in February of this year refused to make a decision on permanently blocking Rutracker mirrors precisely on the basis of the absence of a legislative base. If the bill proposed by Roskomnadzor and the right holders is adopted, then there will not be such a problem - they will block copies of the sites already in semi-automatic mode.
Rights holders propose to oblige to fight with copies of blocked resources and search services. If they disagree or do poor work on blocking links to pirated content, search engines will be fined . Providers who in time did not restrict access to a blocked resource will also be punished.
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/372051/
All Articles