The registrar webnames.ru continues to practice splitting the domain names at its own discretion.
Registrar LLC Regtime (webnames.ru) continues to practice splitting the domain names without legal grounds, according to the portal rublacklist.net . This time, the opentown.org resource was hit. The domain registrar suspended delegation of a domain after receiving a document, presumably from the FSB. “Presumably,” because the way the letter submitted by the registrar's support service, which came, they said, from internal organs, as well as its content, caused a number of questions to human rights activists rublacklist.
A copy of the letter due to which the registrar suspended the domain. Clickable
Upon detailed consideration of the situation, the controversial material posted on the opentown.org resource has been “walking” around the network for quite some time, and the wording “in the actions of the site administrators are seen signs of art. 283 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation " caused even more questions from representatives of" roscomsvoboda ". According to human rights activists, Art. 283 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is the disclosure of state secrets, which still need to have access. Replicated on the Internet for almost a year, the text, in the opinion of human rights activists, looks like a “state secret” very poorly.
Any other documents confirming the legality of their actions, the registrar could not provide, and the letter above, and the design, and the wording, is very similar to a fake, noted on rublacklist.
')
Previously, one of the clients of webnames.ru has already come across a similar “alternative” way to lock resources. Then the question of the legality of such actions (delimitation of the domain instead of blocking by Roskomnadzor in the territory of the Russian Federation) was decided in courts of various instances.
A copy of the letter due to which the registrar suspended the domain. Clickable
Upon detailed consideration of the situation, the controversial material posted on the opentown.org resource has been “walking” around the network for quite some time, and the wording “in the actions of the site administrators are seen signs of art. 283 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation " caused even more questions from representatives of" roscomsvoboda ". According to human rights activists, Art. 283 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is the disclosure of state secrets, which still need to have access. Replicated on the Internet for almost a year, the text, in the opinion of human rights activists, looks like a “state secret” very poorly.
Any other documents confirming the legality of their actions, the registrar could not provide, and the letter above, and the design, and the wording, is very similar to a fake, noted on rublacklist.
')
Previously, one of the clients of webnames.ru has already come across a similar “alternative” way to lock resources. Then the question of the legality of such actions (delimitation of the domain instead of blocking by Roskomnadzor in the territory of the Russian Federation) was decided in courts of various instances.
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/368179/
All Articles