Hub user and hack judge
It is not uncommon to see ideas on how to improve a project from one side or another. As a rule, ideas consist in the upgrade of services in the form of adding new baubles to improve the comfort of using this service. Or other modifications associated directly with the site. Unfortunately, ideas on improving the quality of users, rather than the project, are not often suggested.
Hub users often become hacks. And what is most disappointing is judged by those who express a contradictory opinion, which is incomparable with the opinion of the appraiser, which is immediately punishable by lowering karma. There is a tendency to fear to express a contradiction, and if someone dares to do this, he often attributes a line to his comment, like, "please do not minus, I just expressed my truthful attitude to the question posed." Why it happens? Why are people afraid to speak out? Why Habrsudy minus the comment of a person who made a mistake and did not "drive into the topic"?
Who do users of habr want to be, judges, or users who want to build a community based on understanding and accepting a different point of view, even if it is the opposite of your thoughts on an exposed question? Habr is a project with a great idea, where the hardware is in its essence, but are users ready to keep this essence high?
Many questions, the answer to which is not quite easy to form. But, perhaps, for those who read these questions and those who are judges at the Habré, some drawbacks of the project will become obvious from the user side, and questions of usability will become less relevant than the problem of the company in general, because this site basically works for society that uses it. If the user is afraid to express his opinion, then this is a clear sign that there is a certain disease in it, the name of which is “habrsudya”.
')
Perhaps there would be more interesting ideas and thoughts, albeit controversial, if we mined outright fools, but not different points of view, if we minus boors, and not those who didn’t “drive into the subject” at the end of a hard day’s work wrote nonsense. Not a site needs an upgrade ... We need an upgrade. Our actions.
Hub users often become hacks. And what is most disappointing is judged by those who express a contradictory opinion, which is incomparable with the opinion of the appraiser, which is immediately punishable by lowering karma. There is a tendency to fear to express a contradiction, and if someone dares to do this, he often attributes a line to his comment, like, "please do not minus, I just expressed my truthful attitude to the question posed." Why it happens? Why are people afraid to speak out? Why Habrsudy minus the comment of a person who made a mistake and did not "drive into the topic"?
Who do users of habr want to be, judges, or users who want to build a community based on understanding and accepting a different point of view, even if it is the opposite of your thoughts on an exposed question? Habr is a project with a great idea, where the hardware is in its essence, but are users ready to keep this essence high?
Many questions, the answer to which is not quite easy to form. But, perhaps, for those who read these questions and those who are judges at the Habré, some drawbacks of the project will become obvious from the user side, and questions of usability will become less relevant than the problem of the company in general, because this site basically works for society that uses it. If the user is afraid to express his opinion, then this is a clear sign that there is a certain disease in it, the name of which is “habrsudya”.
')
Perhaps there would be more interesting ideas and thoughts, albeit controversial, if we mined outright fools, but not different points of view, if we minus boors, and not those who didn’t “drive into the subject” at the end of a hard day’s work wrote nonsense. Not a site needs an upgrade ... We need an upgrade. Our actions.
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/3677/
All Articles