War and IT pros.

No war benefits any people in the long run. (can be checked by historical facts).

War can be beneficial only to individuals at a limited historical moment.

No one can unleash and support the war alone, without the support of the masses. So war is possible only in the conditions of information restriction of the people, only when the people know part of the truth and do not think (do not know) about the possible consequences.
')
If the broad masses are given all the information (from both sides of the conflict), if they can express points of view and claims to each other, if they estimate the development of the situation together and make long-term forecasts, they will most likely understand the disadvantage of war. Moreover, if their leaders remain without support, they will not be able to unleash and support the war.

Is it possible today using the Internet to solve the problem of lack of information and lack of dialogue?

How to organize information so that the most reasonable (mass) point of view is the most accessible?

How to build a discussion? Which blocks to break?

Presumably:
• Conflict wording
• The history of the conflict
• Current state
• Arguments of the parties
• Forecast of the situation
• Long-term forecast of the situation
• Suggested conflict resolution options
• Concrete steps to resolve the conflict.