"10 years for the spread of imitation and hentai" unanimously adopted in the second reading

The bill , under which imitation and hentai will be considered child pornography, was adopted unanimously in the second reading this afternoon.

438 deputies voted for, no one voted against.



Total, an extensive layer of pornography with a light hand Mizulina officially goes from the usual to the nursery:
')

The materials and objects with pornographic images of minors in this article and article 242.2 of this Code are understood as materials and objects containing any image or description for sexual purposes:
fully or partially nude genital organs of a minor;
a minor who commits or imitates sexual intercourse or other acts of a sexual nature;
sexual intercourse or other acts of a sexual nature committed in relation to or with the minor;
an adult person depicting a minor who commits or imitates sexual intercourse or other acts of a sexual nature.

Since 2012, an expert commission has been active at Roskomnadzor, which gives conclusions whether the material is child pornography. With examples of what lay out on VKontakte will be given from 3 to 10 years, can be found here .

In the text form, the definition here - vk.com/wall-76229642_34389

Now it is a little about statistics convicted for distribution of a pornography (usual and children's) for last years.
Yes, the distribution and ordinary pornography in the Russian Federation is punishable from 2 to 6 years in prison, and the distribution does not mean only sale.

The lion's share of convicts are those who have added a video to their social networks page.

Here are a few triumphant reports from the Ministry of Internal Affairs on the detention of such especially dangerous criminals:

32.mvd.ru/news/item/6819280
39.mvd.ru/news/item/7087301
52.mvd.ru/news/item/7152123

Now let's see how many people per year are punished under these articles and how they are punished.

The Judicial Department has a website with remarkable statistics - www.cdep.ru/index.php?id=79 At the moment it lies, maybe it will work tomorrow. There are xls files with statistics of convicts under articles by year and with statistics of penalties under articles.

For 12 months of 2015, 165 people were convicted under Article 242 + 75 under this article as an additional one.
According to Article 242.1, 180 people were convicted + 15 had it as an additional one.
In almost all cases, the conviction was by the most serious part of the articles - with an aggravating "using the Internet" attribute.

Total convicted 435 people.

Let's see the distribution of sentences:

According to Article 242, 4 people received a real term, 67 - a condition and about 10 people fines and so on.
According to 242.1, 25 people (one third!) Received real terms , 54 - conditions, about 10 forced labor, and so on.
Forced labor is essentially no different from a colony, so not even two-thirds of the people received the condition, but rather 60%. The remaining 2/5 received real terms for torrents and VK.