Convince me, Microsoft!

Want a lawsuit from Microsoft? You may have such a chance. You, of course, heard about Microsoft ’s claims on the violation of Linux and other GCO at least 235 of their patents. Microsoft's innovation, as usual, is expressed in intimidation and ingratiation. Does anyone believe that they will tell you exactly what patents Linux is violating? As Bolmer said, “let's be honest. " Honesty is expensive, even for mega-rich people like Bolmer. If he really is not cunning, of course. Namely, can we imagine in our most sick fantasies that Microsoft will provide its own private code on the subject of checking the non-infringement of other patents?

My favorite place in this article is: “The Redmond giant claims that the reason for the high quality of the OPP is that it violates more than 200 Microsoft patents”. In other words, only commercial software can be of high quality, and if the open software turned out to be good, then it must have been stolen from the closed one! If commercial means quality, then how do they explain this amount of shit they have released?

Christian Einfeldt of Digital Tipping Point threw a virtual glove and created an open letter in which signatories require Microsoft to sue them first. In other words, “Microsoft, answer for the bazaar!”
')
You can also sign this letter .