This is a pilot issue of a series of interviews with interface designers. Not super-stars, but ordinary guys who work on commercial and mass products and services. Today, the main character is Mikhail Ozornin. He designs interfaces for dismal men in suits and ties. And Mikhail - a graduate of the first set of school Gorbunova.
I was a developer, a system analyst, a project manager, and then I came to design and design. Now - interface designer at Positive Technologies. I bet you haven't heard of her? Usually, no one outside the information security market knows it, and information security specialists know everything.
I make interfaces for these IB specialists. These are the people who force you to invent complex passwords, and then also change them every 43 days. They usually cannot choose the programs they use at work (corporate software is the same), but they also want convenient and understandable interfaces. I design various scanners, behavior analysis systems, event collection and analysis.
He grew up in Yekaterinburg, moved to Moscow. I love bicycles (in cities) and travel, I prefer Amsterdam or Peter instead of Phuket or Bali.
I like the idea that I am at least a little making the world more orderly, simpler and more aesthetic. A sort of struggle with the second law of thermodynamics. I am glad when I bring the decision and the reaction “oh, was it possible?”. This, however, is very, very rare.
This is difficult. The market for corporate software products is often far from good design. (Here Artem Loki writes a little about it ). Get together and write a post for those who are not familiar with what corporate software is.
We have to deal not only with design, but also to educate our colleagues so that they move from the tasks “insert a checkbox” to “think up a solution for such a task”. Not fast, but it turns out. Designers already have authority in teams, they are listened to, they are not slaughtered for them.
Here is what you have to use:
Many companies do not show screenshots of products, ours, as a rule, too. Publicly my products did not seem to be. But believe me, there is not much interesting.
A month after graduation, I wrote a post “ 9 months at the Bureau Internship School ” in which I described the results and the opinion. I re-read it now and in the general assessment I still agree. The only thing for the "product designer" there is not enough about the product: research, hypotheses, prototypes, EMViPi. I a little in vain then used this term. There was not enough typography at the macro level, but at the font level.
In general, these were the most useful 9 months for me as a designer. I do not regret, and if I returned at that time, I would go again and this time I tried to get more from school.
I have everything like everyone else: a sketch, a paper notebook, an atom , Alfred, mail.app, screenshot and skype. Impeccable among them.
Sketch: not because Photoshop is bad, I just do not know how to use it. I have long enjoyed fireworks, but then it became clear that there was no future in it. Sketch is a normally made fireworks.
I can not imagine a sketch without Compo , Kraft and a couple of plug-ins.
Alfred tried out only about a month and a half ago (he did not go before), now he is uncomfortable without him. The number of my snippets and workflow is slowly growing.
For the past few months, I have not been forced to use Mail.app, he has stopped working normally with Ekschendzhem. Waiting for the release of Sierra - it was repaired.
I do not have a smartphone. There is a phone Philips Xenium X130 , he knows how to call and write sms.
I agree with the Internship School entrance list:
Once again I looked at my grades on Livelib, everything is so. All these books are worth reading. Some are better, some are worse, but all are needed.
Start with Norman and Ruskin (skip the end about Canon Cat), then Taffy. By layout: MĂĽller-Brockmann is more academic, for life is more useful Harrover.
What I would add:
It turned out that I am not a member of any communities: I have subscribed to UX Russia , but there has been no life there for a long time, I have been registered in the “ Useful Club ”, but there is not much going on there either.
From conferences I sometimes go to the WUD or Dribble Meetup when I am in the city. I am skeptical of UX Russia: the last two, on which I was, were very frankly bad.
I appreciate it when conferences spread videos, I watch reports at double speed.
It’s hard for me to work with people who have very different principles . The absence of 1-2 of the principles complicates the joint work, the absence of several makes the joint work unlikely.
Grieve constant articles "10 best ways to make a good design." Even more depressing, if it is a bad translation of English articles. I do not believe that without English you can now somehow exist in the world.
Do well and do not do bad :–)
Michael on Habré: mikeozornin
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/309032/
All Articles