Misunderstanding
Yesterday a topic about the “Name of Russia” startup thundered quite well.
And to be honest, I was a little disappointed in the habrachelovek. For 500 comments, people resent the senselessness of the project, the lack of voice restrictions on ip, argue about the role of Stalin, but simply do not bother to read this controversial site more closely.
Everything turns out to be very simple - this voting was done within the framework (and for me so exclusively, otherwise there really would have been no point) a sociological study to find out how people of different generations relate to the same historical figures.
')
You can argue about the decision to give the opportunity to vote countless times, but apparently it was meaningful (since they openly declare it). The question of why everyone got thrown into “one pile” also disappears.
This is how it is. Although personally, I still refer to the fund "Public Opinion" and its method with a great skepticism.
And to be honest, I was a little disappointed in the habrachelovek. For 500 comments, people resent the senselessness of the project, the lack of voice restrictions on ip, argue about the role of Stalin, but simply do not bother to read this controversial site more closely.
Everything turns out to be very simple - this voting was done within the framework (and for me so exclusively, otherwise there really would have been no point) a sociological study to find out how people of different generations relate to the same historical figures.
')
You can argue about the decision to give the opportunity to vote countless times, but apparently it was meaningful (since they openly declare it). The question of why everyone got thrown into “one pile” also disappears.
This is how it is. Although personally, I still refer to the fund "Public Opinion" and its method with a great skepticism.
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/28891/
All Articles