Newspaper sites: “Do not link to us”
How will the rest of the market players react to the offer of The Guardian to developers for free to use a million articles from their website as part of the API being opened ? If the websites of newspapers do not change the conditions and rules for the use of their content, then it will take a long time to wait for republishing. Almost everywhere newspapers forbid copying their content. But some have come to the point that they prohibit not only referring, but even reading their sites.
Below are quotes from the conditions and rules for the use of content from sites of different newspapers. Interestingly, they all contradict the SHARE buttons used right there.
Daily Mirror: Do not link to us
Clause 2.1: “You also agree not to link to the internal pages of the site ... for any purpose, unless you receive special permission from MGN Ltd ( publisher - comment of the translator).”
Daily Mail: Do not link to us
“You do not have the right to link to this site from other sites without prior written permission from Associated.”
')
The Sun: Don't refer to us
Point 10: "Links to the site without permission are prohibited"
Telegraph: At 15:00 it was still impossible
It used to be written there: “You should not link to ... any part of the site without written permission.” But 5 hours later, after I posted it on Twitter, they deleted this item.
Independent: Confused
On the one hand: “The third party is allowed to refer to articles published on the INM sites (using the publisher ’s commentary) using the URL and quoting the title of the source site.” On the other hand: "The third party should not refer to ... any part of the site."
FT: Do not read at work
Read for personal use only, not for business use: “If you use FT.com“ at work ”... and your use goes beyond your personal non-commercial interest, you should contact our content sales service at FTSales.Support@ft.com and discuss the issue of paid use of our content. "Do they apply the same rules to the paper version?
Times: Do not link to us
"Links to the site ... are prohibited without permission."
Below are quotes from the conditions and rules for the use of content from sites of different newspapers. Interestingly, they all contradict the SHARE buttons used right there.
Daily Mirror: Do not link to us
Clause 2.1: “You also agree not to link to the internal pages of the site ... for any purpose, unless you receive special permission from MGN Ltd ( publisher - comment of the translator).”
Daily Mail: Do not link to us
“You do not have the right to link to this site from other sites without prior written permission from Associated.”
')
The Sun: Don't refer to us
Point 10: "Links to the site without permission are prohibited"
Telegraph: At 15:00 it was still impossible
It used to be written there: “You should not link to ... any part of the site without written permission.” But 5 hours later, after I posted it on Twitter, they deleted this item.
Independent: Confused
On the one hand: “The third party is allowed to refer to articles published on the INM sites (using the publisher ’s commentary) using the URL and quoting the title of the source site.” On the other hand: "The third party should not refer to ... any part of the site."
FT: Do not read at work
Read for personal use only, not for business use: “If you use FT.com“ at work ”... and your use goes beyond your personal non-commercial interest, you should contact our content sales service at FTSales.Support@ft.com and discuss the issue of paid use of our content. "Do they apply the same rules to the paper version?
Times: Do not link to us
"Links to the site ... are prohibited without permission."
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/288756/
All Articles