Google and the bank solved the problem in an unnamed way.
The bank, responsible for randomly sending sensitive information to the email address of an unknown Gmail client and persuading a judge to issue a warrant for Google to deactivate the account, resolved the problem together with the search giant, after which both companies filed a motion to dismiss.
Google spokesman Andrew Pederson (Andrew Pederson) declined to comment on exactly how the problem was solved, as, however, call the owner of the account. He explained that at the initial request of the bank to identify the user, the company replied that in order to do this it would be necessary to obtain a corresponding court order. Such a ruling was issued by the San Jose (California) District Court last week and was executed .
“After notifying the account holder, we executed a court order. However, as a result of cooperation with Rocky Mountain Bank and the court, we resolved the issue regarding the bank’s error, and both sides agreed to cancel the restraining order (TRO) and terminate the case, ”he said.
')
“Although we regret that the user was blocked through no fault of his own, we do not have the legal ability to activate the account until the court approves our application for termination and cancellation of the restraining order (TRO),” added Pederson . "We hope that the court will act promptly, and as soon as the petition is satisfied, we will activate the account."
... Tells CNET News
Google spokesman Andrew Pederson (Andrew Pederson) declined to comment on exactly how the problem was solved, as, however, call the owner of the account. He explained that at the initial request of the bank to identify the user, the company replied that in order to do this it would be necessary to obtain a corresponding court order. Such a ruling was issued by the San Jose (California) District Court last week and was executed .
“After notifying the account holder, we executed a court order. However, as a result of cooperation with Rocky Mountain Bank and the court, we resolved the issue regarding the bank’s error, and both sides agreed to cancel the restraining order (TRO) and terminate the case, ”he said.
')
“Although we regret that the user was blocked through no fault of his own, we do not have the legal ability to activate the account until the court approves our application for termination and cancellation of the restraining order (TRO),” added Pederson . "We hope that the court will act promptly, and as soon as the petition is satisfied, we will activate the account."
... Tells CNET News
Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/284448/
All Articles