Richard Stallman, President of the Free Software Foundation (Free Software Foundation), published on his website an article entitled “The Danger of Electronic Books” (“The Danger of E-books”). In it, he compares printed and electronic books. So, for printed books it is characteristic:
* You can buy in cash, anonymously;
* You are not required to sign licenses that will limit your use;
* The format is known, no patented technologies are required to read the book;
* You can physically copy / scan books (and this is sometimes under copyright law);
* No one has the right to destroy your book.
Richard Stallman cites Amazon’s typical e-book distribution terms:
* The user needs to identify himself to get the book;
* The user may be required to accept restrictive licenses for the use of electronic books;
* The format can be classified, and working with it is possible only with the help of proprietary software;
* The copying of books can be imposed as software limitations (DRM), and legal (licensing policy), which are often more significant than for traditional books;
* Amazon can remotely delete a book (as, for example, in 2009, when thousands of copies of George Orwell’s 1984 novel were deleted).
Thus, e-books have much more restrictions than printed ones. According to Richard Stallman, it is necessary to abandon their use until manufacturers respect the freedom of users. And although companies claim that a stronger restriction of user rights is necessary to support authors, in fact such a copyright system is much better suited to support companies themselves. There are other ways to support authors:
* Distribute funds based on the "cubic root" of the popularity of the authors;
* Ensure the possibility of sending anonymous voluntary payments to authors.
[
original ,
source ]