Import substitution successes or entertaining statistics based on the Register of Federal State Information Systems

There is such a wonderful resource - the Register of Federal State Information Systems , in which state structures are obliged to register their more or less serious (but not secret) information systems. It is rather small, I have long wanted to dig into it and take a closer look at what systems are and how they work, every day making the life of an ordinary citizen even easier and happier.

The registry is placed on the portal of Roskomnadzor, which tries to be in the trend of publicity, so there is a section with open data sets on it - great! We download the most recent archive of the Registry on 02/16/2016, inside there is an xml upload from September 2015 ... Good try, citizen. We'll have to supplement the "open data" with fresh information directly from the site, where everything has been done to complicate the parsing of the Registry to enemies. As a result, as of March 8, 2016, I received a list of 339 federal state information systems, for which I would like to present some interesting infographics below.

For each GIS in the Registry, several supported OS and DBMS can be indicated at once, thus, it is impossible to understand with which software it works in reality. Therefore, in the following three diagrams for such systems, the plus sign was placed in several categories at once.

1. Distribution on supported server OS

From domestic developments, only the mysterious Zircon operating system based on Solaris, Alt Linux, and MSVS is mentioned.
')

2. Distribution on supported client OS

What exactly several applicants mean by “Mobile operating system” is not clear.

3. Used DBMS

From the DBMS, only the Red Database (based on Firebird), IRBIS64 and Linter-VS can be considered domestic developments.

4. Storage Formats

Font size corresponds to the prevalence of support.


Using this diagram you can play an exciting game under the conditional name “Search for office document formats approved by GOST R ISO / IEC 26300-2010 and don’t get their support in the GIS”. Formats that were still in 2011, before the era of import substitution, were to become the single standard for state document circulation. But it seems that something has gone wrong again. 3 years ago I already wrote about how, to put it mildly, the Open Document is slowly being introduced on the websites of state institutions. Go and now there. For only 10 GIS, support for GOST formats is mentioned.

5. Using office software

Those GIS in which it was specified other software (not office package), or there was no data at all - were not considered.



In general, some Registry participants quite strangely understand such a term as Free Software (there is such a graph in the Registry), writing Internet Explorer , Delphi and even Ccleaner to its ranks.

6. Distribution of GIS by commissioning date

What is remarkable, apparently, so as not to be late, as always, Slow Pochta Russia has set the date of commissioning for its State housing and utilities information system as early as July 2016. This is the only GIS from the future.

7. Distribution by office

The larger the area of ​​the rectangle, the greater the number of GISs listed in this department.

8. The amount of money spent on the development, modernization and operation

In the Register there is a field “Information about the sources of financing the creation, operation, modernization of FGIS”, which in free form contains information about the cost of the system for the taxpayer. The obligation and frequency of entering this information into the Registry is not clear, but it gives a rough idea of ​​the cost amounts.

Only 7 information systems account for half of all funds spent (amounts are indicated in thousand rubles):


The first and second places with the minimum gap are occupied by GAS Elections and Justice . The honorable, 3rd place goes to the automated system of the Ministry of Internal Affairs with the speaker's name IBD-F . This mighty three GIS accounts for more than a quarter of all expenses indicated in the Register - 61 billion rubles.